Diagnostic Validation of a Whole-Slide Imaging Scanner in Cytological Samples: Diagnostic Accuracy and Comparison With Light Microscopy. Issue 3 (May 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bonsembiante, Federico; Bonfanti, Ugo; Cian, Francesco; Cavicchioli, Laura; Zattoni, Beatrice; Gelain, Maria Elena
• Is Part Of: Veterinary pathology. Volume 56:Issue 3(2019)
• Page Start: 429
• Page End: 434
• Publication Date: 2019-05
• Subjects: cat -- cytology -- veterinary clinical pathology -- diagnostic accuracy -- digital microscopy -- dog -- telecytology -- validation -- whole-slide imaging -- virtual microscopy; Veterinary pathology -- Periodicals; Pathology, Veterinary -- Periodicals; 636.089607
• DOI: 10.1177/0300985818825128
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0300-9858

Abstract

Digital slides created by whole-slide imaging scanners can be evaluated by pathologists located in remote sites, but the process must be validated before this technology can be applied to routine cytological diagnosis. The aim of this study was to validate a whole-slide imaging scanner for cytological samples. Sixty cytological samples, whose diagnoses were confirmed by gold-standard examinations (histology or flow cytometry), were digitalized using a whole-slide imaging scanner. Digital slides and glass slides were examined by 3 observers with different levels of cytopathological expertise. No significant differences were noted between digital and glass slides in regard to the number of cases correctly diagnosed, or the sensitivity, specificity, or diagnostic accuracy, irrespective of the observers' expertise. The agreements between the digital slides and the gold-standard examinations were moderate to substantial, while the agreements between the glass slides and the gold-standard examinations were substantial for all 3 observers. The intraobserver agreements between digital and glass slides were substantial to almost perfect. The interobserver agreements when evaluating digital slides were moderate between observers 1 and 2 and between observers 1 and 3 while they were substantial between observers 2 and 3. In conclusion, our study demonstrated that the digital slides produced by the whole-slide imaging scanner are adequate to diagnose cytological samples and are similar among clinical pathologists with differing levels of expertise.