Educational differences in the validity of self-reported physical activity. (December 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Winckers, Annemarie; Mackenbach, Joreintje; Compernolle, Sofie; Nicolaou, Mary; van der Ploeg, Hidde; De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse; Brug, Johannes; Lakerveld, Jeroen
• Is Part Of: BMC public health. Volume 15:Number 1(2015)
• Page Start: 1
• Page End: 5
• Publication Date: 2015-12
• Subjects: Accelerometer -- Education level -- Questionnaire -- Self-report -- Validity -- Physical activity; Public health -- Periodicals; 362.105
• DOI: 10.1186/s12889-015-2656-7
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1471-2458

Abstract

Abstract Background The assessment of physical activity for surveillance or population based studies is usually done with self-report questionnaires. However, bias in self-reported physical activity may be greater in lower educated than in higher educated populations. The aim of the present study is to describe educational differences in the validity of self-reported physical activity. Methods We included 196 healthy adults (age 57 ± 15.4, of whom 17 % low, 24 % medium and 59 % high educated). Criterion validity of an adapted International Physical Activity Questionnaire was assessed against the ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometer. Results While criterion validity of self-reported physical activity was low to moderate in the total sample (Spearman rho ranged from 0.16 to 0.27, depending on the variables used), the validity in lower educated respondents was poor (-0.07 to 0.05). Conclusions The results confirm the hypothesis that self-report physical activity questionnaires are less valid in lower educated populations.