What can possibly go wrong? Anticipatory work in space operations. Issue 2 (May 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Johansen, Jens; Almklov, Petter; Mohammad, Abdul
• Is Part Of: Cognition, technology & work. Volume 18:Issue 2(2016)
• Page Start: 333
• Page End: 350
• Publication Date: 2016-05
• Subjects: Anticipation -- Space operations -- Distributed cognition -- Procedures -- Resilience -- Control room -- Voice loop; Human-machine systems -- Periodicals; Cognitive science -- Periodicals; Technology -- Sociological aspects -- Periodicals; Cognition -- Periodicals; Work environment -- Periodicals; 153
• DOI: 10.1007/s10111-015-0357-8
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1435-5558

Abstract

Abstract This paper explores how different forms of anticipatory work contribute to reliability in high-risk space operations. It is based on ethnographic field work, participant observation and interviews supplemented with video recordings from a control room responsible for operating a microgravity greenhouse at the International Space Station (ISS). Drawing on examples from different stages of a biological experiment on the ISS, we demonstrate how engineers, researchers and technicians work to anticipate and proactively mitigate possible problems. Space research is expensive and risky. The experiments are planned over the course of many years by a globally distributed network of organizations. Owing to the inaccessibility of the ISS, every trivial detail that could possibly cause a problem is subject to scrutiny. We discuss what we label anticipatory work: practices constituted of an entanglement of cognitive, social and technical elements involved in anticipating and proactively mitigating everything that might go wrong. We show how the nature of anticipatory work changes between planning and the operational phases of an experiment. In the planning phase, operators inscribe their anticipation into technology and procedures. In the operational phase, we show how troubleshooting involves the ability to look ahead in the evolving temporal trajectory of the ISS operations and to juggle pre-planned fixes along these trajectories. A key objective of this paper is to illustrate how anticipation is shared between humans and different forms of technology. Moreover, it illustrates the importance of including considerations of temporality in safety and reliability research.