Varsity Medical Ethics Debate 2015: should nootropic drugs be available under prescription on the NHS?. (December 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Thorley, Emma; Kang, Isaac; D'Costa, Stephanie; Vlazaki, Myrto; Ayeko, Olaoluwa; Arbe-Barnes, Edward; Swerner, Casey
• Is Part Of: Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine. Volume 11:issue 1(2016)
• Page Start: 1
• Page End: 3
• Publication Date: 2016-12
• Subjects: Medical ethics -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Philosophy -- Periodicals; 174.2
• DOI: 10.1186/s13010-016-0041-5
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1747-5341

Abstract

Abstract The 2015 Varsity Medical Ethics debate convened upon the motion: "This house believes nootropic drugs should be available under prescription". This annual debate between students from the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, now in its seventh year, provided the starting point for arguments on the subject. The present article brings together and extends many of the arguments put forward during the debate. We explore the current usage of nootropic drugs, their safety and whether it would be beneficial to individuals and society as a whole for them to be available under prescription. The Varsity Medical Debate was first held in 2008 with the aim of allowing students to engage in discussion about ethics and policy within healthcare. The event is held annually and it is hoped that this will allow future leaders to voice a perspective on the arguments behind topics that will feature heavily in future healthcare and science policy. This year the Oxford University Medical Society at the Oxford Union hosted the debate.