Comparative approaches for assessing access to alcohol outlets: exploring the utility of a gravity potential approach. Issue 1 (December 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparative approaches for assessing access to alcohol outlets: exploring the utility of a gravity potential approach. Issue 1 (December 2016)
- Main Title:
- Comparative approaches for assessing access to alcohol outlets: exploring the utility of a gravity potential approach
- Authors:
- Grubesic, Tony
Wei, Ran
Murray, Alan
Pridemore, William - Abstract:
- Abstract Background A growing body of research recommends controlling alcohol availability to reduce harm. Various common approaches, however, provide dramatically different pictures of the physical availability of alcohol. This limits our understanding of the distribution of alcohol access, the causes and consequences of this distribution, and how best to reduce harm. The aim of this study is to introduce both a gravity potential measure of access to alcohol outlets, comparing its strengths and weaknesses to other popular approaches, and an empirically-derived taxonomy of neighborhoods based on the type of alcohol access they exhibit. Methods We obtained geospatial data on Seattle, including the location of 2402 alcohol outlets, United States Census Bureau estimates on 567 block groups, and a comprehensive street network. We used exploratory spatial data analysis and employed a measure of inter-rater agreement to capture differences in our taxonomy of alcohol availability measures. Results Significant statistical and spatial variability exists between measures of alcohol access, and these differences have meaningful practical implications. In particular, standard measures of outlet density (e.g., spatial, per capita, roadway miles) can lead to biased estimates of physical availability that over-emphasize the influence of the control variables. Employing a gravity potential approach provides a more balanced, geographically-sensitive measure of access to alcohol outlets.Abstract Background A growing body of research recommends controlling alcohol availability to reduce harm. Various common approaches, however, provide dramatically different pictures of the physical availability of alcohol. This limits our understanding of the distribution of alcohol access, the causes and consequences of this distribution, and how best to reduce harm. The aim of this study is to introduce both a gravity potential measure of access to alcohol outlets, comparing its strengths and weaknesses to other popular approaches, and an empirically-derived taxonomy of neighborhoods based on the type of alcohol access they exhibit. Methods We obtained geospatial data on Seattle, including the location of 2402 alcohol outlets, United States Census Bureau estimates on 567 block groups, and a comprehensive street network. We used exploratory spatial data analysis and employed a measure of inter-rater agreement to capture differences in our taxonomy of alcohol availability measures. Results Significant statistical and spatial variability exists between measures of alcohol access, and these differences have meaningful practical implications. In particular, standard measures of outlet density (e.g., spatial, per capita, roadway miles) can lead to biased estimates of physical availability that over-emphasize the influence of the control variables. Employing a gravity potential approach provides a more balanced, geographically-sensitive measure of access to alcohol outlets. Conclusions Accurately measuring the physical availability of alcohol is critical for understanding the causes and consequences of its distribution and for developing effective evidence-based policy to manage the alcohol outlet licensing process. A gravity potential model provides a superior measure of alcohol access, and the alcohol access-based taxonomy a helpful evidence-based heuristic for scholars and local policymakers. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Population health metrics. Volume 14:Issue 1(2016)
- Journal:
- Population health metrics
- Issue:
- Volume 14:Issue 1(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 14, Issue 1 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 14
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0014-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 1
- Page End:
- 17
- Publication Date:
- 2016-12
- Subjects:
- Health status indicators -- Periodicals
Population -- Statistics -- Periodicals
Health status indicators -- Measurement
Health status indicators -- Statistical methods
614.420727 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/ ↗
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/tocrender.fcgi?journal=200 ↗
http://link.springer.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1186/s12963-016-0097-x ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1478-7954
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 10033.xml