Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic factors for primary spinal epidural lymphoma: report on 36 Chinese patients and review of the literature. Issue 1 (December 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Xiong, Le; Liao, Ling-Min; Ding, Jian-Wu; Zhang, Zhi-Lin; Liu, An-Wen; Huang, Long
• Is Part Of: BMC cancer. Volume 17:Issue 1(2017)
• Page Start: 1
• Page End: 6
• Publication Date: 2017-12
• Subjects: Primary spinal epidural lymphomas -- Treatment -- Prognosis; Cancer -- Periodicals; 616.994005
• DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3093-z
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1471-2407

Abstract

Abstract Background Due to the uncommon nature of primary spinal epidural lymphomas (PSELs), there has been little research looking at prognostic indicators for the tumor. To our knowledge, this is the largest study to evaluate possible clinical and pathologic prognostic factors in PSEL patients. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 130 cases of PSEL, including 36 Chinese patients and 94 published case reports from 1985 to 2015. Patient treatment regimens included surgery (S;n = 119), surgery followed by chemotherapy (S + CT;n = 25), surgery followed by radiotherapy (S + RT;n = 26), and surgery followed by chemotherapy and radiotherapy (S + CT + RT;n = 50). Results Review of the most recent case follow-up data (time varied) found 51 patients (47%) alive and tumor-free, 10 patients (9%) alive with tumor present, and 47 patients (44%) deceased. The 3-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 81.1% and 46.3%, respectively. Favorable prognostic factors found by univariate analysis were female sex, B-cell lymphoma diagnosis, cervical spine location, and combined modality treatment. Furthermore, multivariate analysis revealed that thoracic spine location (HR = 4.629, 95% CI = [1.911, 31.667], P = 0.042 for OS) and the lack of combined modality treatment (HR = 12.697, 95% CI = [2.664, 48.612], P < 0.0001 for DFS) were associated with poor survival in PSEL patients. Conclusions PSEL demonstrates specific clinical features and is associated with a relatively good prognosis. Thoracic spine location is a significant poor prognostic factor, and combined modality treatment is associated with improved disease-free survival, but not overall survival.