Optimization of DNA extraction for advancing coral microbiota investigations. Issue 1 (December 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Weber, Laura; DeForce, Emelia; Apprill, Amy
• Is Part Of: Microbiome. Volume 5:Issue 1(2017)
• Page Start: 1
• Page End: 14
• Publication Date: 2017-12
• Subjects: Coral microbiota -- DNA extraction -- Optimization -- SSU ribosomal RNA gene -- Amplicon sequencing; Microbiology -- Periodicals; Microorganisms -- Periodicals; Medical microbiology -- Periodicals; Soil microbiology -- Periodicals; Microbiological Phenomena -- Periodicals; Environmental Microbiology -- Periodicals; Medical microbiology; Microbiology; Microorganisms; Soil microbiology; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 579.17
• DOI: 10.1186/s40168-017-0229-y
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2049-2618

Abstract

Abstract Background DNA-based sequencing approaches are commonly used to identify microorganisms and their genes and document trends in microbial community diversity in environmental samples. However, extraction of microbial DNA from complex environmental samples like corals can be technically challenging, and extraction methods may impart biases on microbial community structure. Methods We designed a two-phase study in order to propose a comprehensive and efficient method for DNA extraction from microbial cells present in corals and investigate if extraction method influences microbial community composition. During phase I, total DNA was extracted from seven coral species in a replicated experimental design using four different MO BIO Laboratories, Inc., DNA Isolation kits: PowerSoil®, PowerPlant® Pro, PowerBiofilm®, and UltraClean® Tissue & Cells (with three homogenization permutations). Technical performance of the treatments was evaluated using DNA yield and amplification efficiency of small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU ribosomal RNA (rRNA)) genes. During phase II, potential extraction biases were examined via microbial community analysis of SSU rRNA gene sequences amplified from the most successful DNA extraction treatments. Results In phase I of the study, the PowerSoil® and PowerPlant® Pro extracts contained low DNA concentrations, amplified poorly, and were not investigated further. Extracts from PowerBiofilm® and UltraClean® Tissue and Cells permutations were further investigated in phase II, and analysis of sequences demonstrated that overall microbial community composition was dictated by coral species and not extraction treatment. Finer pairwise comparisons of sequences obtained fromOrbicella faveolata, Orbicella annularis, andAcropora humilis corals revealed subtle differences in community composition between the treatments; PowerBiofilm®-associated sequences generally had higher microbial richness and the highest coverage of dominant microbial groups in comparison to the UltraClean® Tissue and Cells treatments, a result likely arising from using a combination of different beads during homogenization. Conclusions Both the PowerBiofilm® and UltraClean® Tissue and Cells treatments are appropriate for large-scale analyses of coral microbiota. However, studies interested in detecting cryptic microbial members may benefit from using the PowerBiofilm® DNA treatment because of the likely enhanced lysis efficiency of microbial cells attributed to using a variety of beads during homogenization. Consideration of the methodology involved with microbial DNA extraction is particularly important for studies investigating complex host-associated microbiota.