Differences in motivation and adherence to a prescribed assignment after face-to-face and online psychoeducation: an experimental study. Issue 1 (December 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Alfonsson, Sven; Johansson, Karin; Uddling, Jonas; Hursti, Timo
• Is Part Of: BMC psychology. Volume 5:Issue 1(2017)
• Page Start: 1
• Page End: 13
• Publication Date: 2017-12
• Subjects: Adherence -- Motivation -- Psychoeducation -- Internet -- Homework assignments; Psychology -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 150.5
• DOI: 10.1186/s40359-017-0172-5
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2050-7283

Abstract

Abstract Background Adherence to treatment homework is associated with positive outcomes in behavioral psychotherapy but compliance to assignments is still often moderate. Whether adherence can be predicted by different types of motivation for the task and whether motivation plays different roles in face-to-face compared to online psychotherapy is unknown. If models of motivation, such as Self-determination theory, can be used to predict patients' behavior, it may facilitate further research into homework promotion. The aims of this study were, therefore, to investigate whether motivation variables could predict adherence to a prescribed assignment in face-to-face and online interventions using a psychotherapy analog model. Methods A total of 100 participants were included in this study and randomized to either a face-to-face or online intervention. Participants in both groups received a psychoeducation session and were given an assignment for the subsequent week. The main outcome measurements were self-reported motivation and adherence to the assignment. Results Participant in the face-to-face condition reported significantly higher levels of motivation and showed higher levels of adherence compared to participants in the online condition. Adherence to the assignment was positively associated with intrinsic motivation and intervention credibility in the whole sample and especially in the online group. Conclusions This study shows that intrinsic motivation and intervention credibility are strong predictors of adherence to assignments, especially in online interventions. The results indicate that intrinsic motivation may be partly substituted with face-to-face contact with a therapist. It may also be possible to identify patients with low motivation in online interventions who are at risk of dropping out. Methods for making online interventions more intrinsically motivating without increasing external pressure are needed. Trial registration clinicaltrials.govNCT02895308 . Retrospectively registered 30 August 2016.