Color radiography in lung nodule detection and characterization: comparison with conventional gray scale radiography. Issue 1 (December 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Song, Inyoung; Yi, Jeong; Park, Jeong; Lee, Kyung; Chung, Myung
• Is Part Of: BMC medical imaging. Volume 16:Issue 1(2016)
• Page Start: 1
• Page End: 7
• Publication Date: 2016-12
• Subjects: Radiography -- Color radiography -- Dual-energy subtraction radiography; Diagnostic imaging -- Periodicals; 616.075405
• DOI: 10.1186/s12880-016-0155-7
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1471-2342

Abstract

Abstract Background To compare the capability of lung nodule detection and characterization between dual-energy radiography with color-representation (DCR) and conventional gray scale chest radiography (GSR). Methods A total of 130 paired chest radiographs (DCR and GSR) obtained from 65 patients (14 with normal scans and 51 with pulmonary nodules) were evaluated. After analysis, 45 non-calcified and 21 calcified nodules were identified. DCR was obtained by adding color space within material-decomposed data (blue for high attenuation and red for low attenuation) and by compounding the manipulated data to one color image. Three radiologists marked suggested nodules on radiographic images and assessed the level of confidence of lesion presence and probability of nodule calcification by using a nine-point rating scale. The jackknife active free-response receiver operating characteristics (JAFROC) analysis was used to evaluate lesion detectability, and multi-reader multi-case receiver operating characteristics (MRMC ROC) analysis was used for the evaluation of the accuracy of nodule calcification prediction. Results Figures of merit (FOM) from JAFROC was 0.807 for DCR and 0.811 for GSR, respectively; nodule detectability was not significantly different between DCR and GSR (p = 0.93). Areas under curve (AUC) from MRMC ROC were 0.944 for DCR and 0.828 for GSR, respectively; performance of DCR in predicting lung nodule calcification was significantly higher than that of GSR (p = 0.04). Conclusions DCR showed similar performance in terms of lung nodule detection compared with GSR. However, DCR does provide a significant benefit in predicting the presence of nodule calcification.