Characterizing geometrical accuracy in clinically optimised 7T and 3T magnetic resonance images for high-precision radiation treatment of brain tumours. (January 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Characterizing geometrical accuracy in clinically optimised 7T and 3T magnetic resonance images for high-precision radiation treatment of brain tumours. (January 2019)
- Main Title:
- Characterizing geometrical accuracy in clinically optimised 7T and 3T magnetic resonance images for high-precision radiation treatment of brain tumours
- Authors:
- Peerlings, Jurgen
Compter, Inge
Janssen, Fiere
Wiggins, Christopher J.
Postma, Alida A.
Mottaghy, Felix M.
Lambin, Philippe
Hoffmann, Aswin L. - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background and purpose: In neuro-oncology, high spatial accuracy is needed for clinically acceptable high-precision radiation treatment planning (RTP). In this study, the clinical applicability of anatomically optimised 7-Tesla (7T) MR images for reliable RTP is assessed with respect to standard clinical imaging modalities. Materials and methods: System- and phantom-related geometrical distortion (GD) were quantified on clinically-relevant MR sequences at 7T and 3T, and on CT images using a dedicated anthropomorphic head phantom incorporating a 3D grid-structure, creating 436 points-of-interest. Global GD was assessed by mean absolute deviation (MADGlobal ). Local GD relative to the magnetic isocentre was assessed by MADLocal . Using 3D displacement vectors of individual points-of-interest, GD maps were created. For clinically acceptable radiotherapy, 7T images need to meet the criteria for accurate dose delivery (GD < 1 mm) and present comparable GD as tolerated in clinically standard 3T MR/CT-based RTP. Results: MADGlobal in 7T and 3T images ranged from 0.3 to 2.2 mm and 0.2–0.8 mm, respectively. MADLocal increased with increasing distance from the isocentre, showed an anisotropic distribution, and was significantly larger in 7T MR sequences (MADLocal = 0.2–1.2 mm) than in 3T (MADLocal = 0.1–0.7 mm) (p < 0.05). Significant differences in GD were detected between 7T images (p < 0.001). However, maximum MADLocal remained ≤1 mm within 68.7 mm diameter sphericalAbstract: Background and purpose: In neuro-oncology, high spatial accuracy is needed for clinically acceptable high-precision radiation treatment planning (RTP). In this study, the clinical applicability of anatomically optimised 7-Tesla (7T) MR images for reliable RTP is assessed with respect to standard clinical imaging modalities. Materials and methods: System- and phantom-related geometrical distortion (GD) were quantified on clinically-relevant MR sequences at 7T and 3T, and on CT images using a dedicated anthropomorphic head phantom incorporating a 3D grid-structure, creating 436 points-of-interest. Global GD was assessed by mean absolute deviation (MADGlobal ). Local GD relative to the magnetic isocentre was assessed by MADLocal . Using 3D displacement vectors of individual points-of-interest, GD maps were created. For clinically acceptable radiotherapy, 7T images need to meet the criteria for accurate dose delivery (GD < 1 mm) and present comparable GD as tolerated in clinically standard 3T MR/CT-based RTP. Results: MADGlobal in 7T and 3T images ranged from 0.3 to 2.2 mm and 0.2–0.8 mm, respectively. MADLocal increased with increasing distance from the isocentre, showed an anisotropic distribution, and was significantly larger in 7T MR sequences (MADLocal = 0.2–1.2 mm) than in 3T (MADLocal = 0.1–0.7 mm) (p < 0.05). Significant differences in GD were detected between 7T images (p < 0.001). However, maximum MADLocal remained ≤1 mm within 68.7 mm diameter spherical volume. No significant differences in GD were found between 7T and 3T protocols near the isocentre. Conclusions: System- and phantom-related GD remained ≤1 mm in central brain regions, suggesting that 7T MR images could be implemented in radiotherapy with clinically acceptable spatial accuracy and equally tolerated GD as in 3T MR/CT-based RTP. For peripheral regions, GD should be incorporated in safety margins for treatment uncertainties. Moreover, the effects of sequence-related factors on GD needs further investigation to obtain RTP-specific MR protocols. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Physics and imaging in radiation oncology. Volume 9(2019)
- Journal:
- Physics and imaging in radiation oncology
- Issue:
- Volume 9(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 9, Issue 2019 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 9
- Issue:
- 2019
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0009-2019-0000
- Page Start:
- 35
- Page End:
- 42
- Publication Date:
- 2019-01
- Subjects:
- Radiation treatment planning -- Neuro-oncology -- Ultra-high field MRI -- Geometrical distortion -- Diametric spherical volume -- Anthropomorphic phantom
Radiotherapy -- Periodicals
Radiation dosimetry -- Periodicals
Cancer -- Imaging -- Periodicals
Oncology -- Periodicals
615.842 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/ ↗
https://www.journals.elsevier.com/physics-and-imaging-in-radiation-oncology/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.phro.2018.12.001 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2405-6316
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 10012.xml