Ecotone response to climatic variability depends on stress gradient interactions. Issue 1 (December 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Malanson, George; Resler, Lynn; Tomback, Diana
• Is Part Of: Climate change responses. Volume 4:Issue 1(2017)
• Page Start: 1
• Page End: 8
• Publication Date: 2017-12
• Subjects: Agent based model -- Competition -- Ecotone -- Extinction -- Facilitation -- Simulation -- Variability; Bioclimatology -- Periodicals; Climatic changes -- Periodicals; Ecology -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals; 577.2
• DOI: 10.1186/s40665-017-0029-4
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2053-7565

Abstract

Abstract Background Variability added to directional climate change could have consequences for ecotone community responses, or positive and negative variations could balance. The response will depend on interactions among individuals along environmental gradients, further affected by stress gradient effects. Methods Two instantiations of the stress gradient hypothesis, simple stress and a size-mediated model, are represented in a spatially explicit agent based simulation of an ecotone derived from observations ofAbies lasiocarpa, Picea engelmannii, andPinus albicaulis in the northern Rocky Mountains. The simple model has two hierarchically competitive species on a single environmental gradient. The environment undergoes progressive climate change and increases in variability. Because the size model includes system memory, it is expected to buffer the effects of extreme events. Results The interactions included in both models of the stress gradient hypothesis similarly reduce the effects of increasing climatic variability. With climate amelioration, the spatial pattern at the ecotone shows an advance of both species into what had been a higher stress area, but with less density when variation increases. In the size-mediated model the competitive species advances farther along the stress gradient at the expense of the second species. The memory embedded in the size-mediated model does not appear to buffer extreme events because the interactions between the two species within their shifting ecotone determine the outcomes. Conclusions Ecotone responses are determined by the differences in slopes of the species response to the environment near their point of intersection and further changed by whether neighbor interactions are competitive. Interactions are more diverse and more interwoven than previously conceived, and their quantification will be necessary to move beyond simplistic species distribution models.