Appraisal of clinical practice guidelines on community-acquired pneumonia in children with AGREE II instrument. Issue 1 (December 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Xie, Zhenwei; Wang, Xiaoling; Sun, Lin; Liu, Jun; Guo, Yan; Xu, Baoping; Zhao, Libo; Shen, Adong
• Is Part Of: BMC pediatrics. Volume 16:Issue 1(2016)
• Page Start: 1
• Page End: 8
• Publication Date: 2016-12
• Subjects: Clinical practice guidelines -- Community-acquired pneumonia -- Children -- Quality assessment -- AGREE II; Pediatrics -- Periodicals; 618.920005
• DOI: 10.1186/s12887-016-0651-5
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1471-2431

Abstract

Abstract Background Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide among children. The growing number of guidelines have been accompanied with a growing concern about variance and conflicts among guideline recommendations. There is a need to critically appraise clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) in order to ensure safe and effective practices. Methods A literature search was systematically conducted in English and Chinese major academic databases (from January 2000 to March 2015). CPGs related to CAP in children were evaluated by four independent assessors, according to AGREE II instruments. Standardized domain scores were calculated for each guideline. Inter-rater reliability was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient. The software used for analysis was SPSS 17.0. Results A total of 10 guidelines met the inclusion criteria and were appraised. Scope and purpose (69.03 %) and clarity of presentation (83.33 %) achieved relative high scores, while the scores of the other four domains were low: stakeholder involvement (42.78 %), rigour of development (44.95 %), applicability (37.60 %), and editorial independence (23.74 %). 3 guidelines were strongly recommended as a result of the overall scores were greater than 60 %. Conclusion The qualities of CPGs for CAP in children were generally acceptable with several flaws. Stakeholder involvement, rigour of development, applicability and editorial independence should be considered and well described in the future development of CPGs.