Modified minimally invasive extensor carpi radialis longus tenodesis for scapholunate dissociation: a prospective observational study. Issue 1 (December 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kaltenborn, Alexander; Hoffmann, Sebastian; Settje, Andreas; Vogt, Peter; Gutcke, André; Rüttermann, Mike
• Is Part Of: BMC musculoskeletal disorders. Volume 18:Issue 1(2017)
• Page Start: 1
• Page End: 8
• Publication Date: 2017-12
• Subjects: Scapholunate dissociation -- ECRL-tenodesis -- Minimal invasive technique -- Wrist surgery -- Carpal instability -- Wrist trauma; Musculoskeletal system -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.705
• DOI: 10.1186/s12891-017-1414-7
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1471-2474

Abstract

Abstract Background Scapholunate dissociation is the most common form of carpal instability. However, there is no gold standard for operative treatment. In this prospective observational study on 54 patients, a modified minimally invasive dynamic extensor carpi radialis longus tenodesis is described, which is characterized by a smaller approach and application of a cannulated screw and washer for tendon fixation. Methods Quick-Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)-questionnaire results, post-operative satisfaction, range of motion and grip strength are analyzed. Results A median Quick-DASH of 54.6 was observed pre-operatively which significantly improved to a median of 28.4 after the procedure (p < 0.001). Median follow-up was 24 months. Of 46 completely followed-up patients, 31 patients (67.4%) reported that they were satisfied with the outcome. Thirty-seven patients (80.4%) would recommend the procedure to a friend. Thirty-five patients (76.1%) reported some kind of complaint in the operated hand during follow-up. There was no association of severity of symptoms and co-morbidities with the outcome. Neither palmar flexion, nor dorsal extension was significantly different between the operated and non-operated wrist. The operated wrists were observed to have less grip strength than non-operated wrists. Conclusions The presented method seems to be as successful as other techniques described in literature. It is less invasive, thus more patient friendly without harming feasibility of future salvage options. However, post-operative complaint rate was quite high.