A review of evidence about use and performance of species distribution modelling ensembles like BIOMOD. Issue 5 (22nd January 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hao, Tianxiao; Elith, Jane; Guillera‐Arroita, Gurutzeta; Lahoz‐Monfort, José J.
• Editors: Serra‐Diaz, Josep
• Is Part Of: Diversity & distributions. Volume 25:Issue 5(2019)
• Page Start: 839
• Page End: 852
• Publication Date: 2019-01-22
• Subjects: BIOMOD -- consensus forecast -- ecological niche models -- ensemble -- habitat suitability models -- species distribution model; Biodiversity -- Periodicals; Biodiversity conservation -- Periodicals; 577
• DOI: 10.1111/ddi.12892
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1366-9516

Abstract

Abstract: Aim: The idea of combining predictions from different models into an ensemble has gained considerable popularity in species distribution modelling, partly due to free and comprehensive software such as the R package BIOMOD. However, despite proliferation of ensemble models, we lack oversight of how and where they are used for modelling distributions, and how well they perform. Here, we present such an overview. Location: Global. Methods: Since BIOMOD is freely available and widely used by ensemble species distribution modellers, we focused on articles that apply BIOMOD, filtering the initial 852 papers identified in our structured literature search to a relevant final subset of 224 eligible peer‐reviewed journal articles. Results: BIOMOD‐based ensembles are used across many taxa and locations, with terrestrial plants being the most represented group of species ( n = 72) and Europe being the most represented continent ( n = 106). These studies often focus on forecasting distributions in the future ( n = 109), and commonly use presence‐only species data ( n = 139) and climatic environmental predictors ( n = 219). An average of six models are used in ensembles, and approximately half of ensembles weight contributions of models by their cross‐validation performance. However, discussion about choices made in the modelling process and unambiguous information on the performance of ensemble models versus individual models are limited. The use of independent data to validate model performance is particularly uncommon. Main conclusions: We document the breadth of ensemble applications, but could not draw strong quantitative conclusions about the predictive performance of ensemble models, due to lack of unambiguous information reported. Understanding how and where ensembles are best used when modelling species distributions is important for enabling best choices for different applications. To enable this objective to be achieved, we provide recommendations for thorough reporting practices in a BIOMOD‐based ensemble workflow.