Accurate recovery of 3D local field in FRP laminated beam based on asymptotic dimension reduction model. (20th May 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Xiao, Peng; Yifeng, Zhong; Dan, Luo; Bing, Deng
• Is Part Of: Construction & building materials. Volume 207(2019)
• Page Start: 357
• Page End: 372
• Publication Date: 2019-05-20
• Subjects: FRP laminated beams -- Variational asymptotic method -- Geometrically nonlinear -- Local fields recovery -- Dimensional reduction; Building materials -- Periodicals; 624.18
• DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.132
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0950-0618

Abstract

Highlights: The asymptotic dimensional reduction model for laminated beams is established by VAM. The classical model and refined model are systematically constructed, respectively. The refined model is casted into GTM using equilibrium equations. The accuracy of GTM is verified through the local fields of the FRP laminated I-beam. The local field distributions of the FRP laminated box-beam are accurately obtained. Abstract: Accurate prediction of local field distribution plays an important role in failure analysis of FRP laminates. Based on the variational asymptotic method (VAM), a asymptotic dimensional reduction model (ADRM) of FRP laminated beams that can be implemented in standard finite element programs is developed, which provides a novel idea for local field recovery of FRP laminated beams. The present theory formulates the original 3D elasticity problem in a variational form, which is applicable for arbitrarily large displacement and global rotation. Then, the unknown 3D warping functions are solved asymptotically by the ADRM, resulting in the classical model (zero-order approximation) and asymptotically correct refined model (first-order approximation), respectively. Finally, the refined model is casted into a generalized Timoshenko beam model (GTM) using equilibrium equations, which can be applied conveniently in real applications. Numerical examples of FRP laminated I-beams and box-beams show that the local field distributions obtained from GTM are in good agreement with those of finite element analysis, while the computational cost and modeling effort of VAM-based analysis are significantly lower than those of direct finite element analysis.