Are radiation oncologists following guidelines? An audit of practice in patients with uncomplicated bone metastases. (March 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Di Lalla, Vanessa; Fortin, Bernard; Pembroke, Catherine; Freeman, Carolyn; Yassa, Michael; Hijal, Tarek
• Is Part Of: Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology. Volume 9(2019)
• Page Start: 13
• Page End: 17
• Publication Date: 2019-03
• Subjects: Palliative radiation therapy -- Quality of care -- Best-practice guidelines; Radiotherapy -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Radiotherapy -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Patients -- Hospital care -- Periodicals; 615.842
• DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2018.12.001
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2405-6324

Abstract

Highlights: At our center single fraction radiotherapy is used in accordance with guidelines. Patient age, performance status and tumor histology influence treatment choice. We added a quality indicator to our performance dashboard to improve adherence. This strategy can be used in other complex practices and improve quality of care. Abstract: Background: Best-practice guidelines recommend single-fraction (SFRT) instead of multi-fraction radiation therapy (MFRT) for uncomplicated symptomatic bone metastases. SFRT is comparable to MFRT in relieving pain, convenient for patients, and cost-effective. Patterns of practice in Canada reveal that SFRT is underused, with significant variability across the country. We audited SFRT use and studied factors that may influence treatment decisions at a large academic tertiary care center in Quebec, Canada. Methods: Patients who received radiotherapy for uncomplicated bone metastases between February 2014 and March 2015 were reviewed. Age, gender, primary histology, site of metastases and performance status were identified as potential factors affecting fractionation. These were explored by Fisher's test on univariate analysis and logistic regression for multivariate analysis. Retreatment rates were analyzed with cumulative incidence and compared with Gray's test. Results: 254 radiotherapy courses were administered to 165 patients, 85.4% of which were delivered using a single fraction of 8 Gy. Patients age less than 70 years and those with breast histology were more likely to receive MFRT (p = 0.04; p = 0.0046). Performance status (ECOG) was a significant predictor of fractionation because of high correlations between young age, breast histology, and ECOG status (p = 0.03). Follow-up was too short in 40% of patients to derive definitive conclusions on retreatment. Conclusions: In accordance with current guidelines, our audit confirms that use of SFRT in patients with uncomplicated bone metastases at our center is high. We identified that patient age, primary histology, and performance status influenced fractionation. Incorporation of this quality indicator into our performance dashboard will allow assessment of retreatment differences and other criteria that may also influence treatment choice.