Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of Chuna manual therapy versus conventional usual care for nonacute low back pain: study protocol for a pilot multicenter, pragmatic randomized controlled trial (pCRN study). Issue 1 (December 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Shin, Byung-Cheul; Kim, Me-riong; Cho, Jae-Heung; Jung, Jae-Young; Kim, Koh-Woon; Lee, Jun-Hwan; Nam, Kibong; Lee, Min ho; Hwang, Eui-Hyoung; Heo, Kwang-Ho; Kim, Namkwen; Ha, In-Hyuk
• Is Part Of: Trials. Volume 18:Issue 1(2017)
• Page Start: 1
• Page End: 10
• Publication Date: 2017-12
• Subjects: Low back pain -- Spinal manipulation -- Cost-benefit analysis -- Complementary therapies -- Protocol; Group-randomized trials -- Periodicals; Randomized Controlled Trials -- Periodicals; 615.0727
• DOI: 10.1186/s13063-016-1756-8
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1745-6215

Abstract

Abstract Background WhileChuna manual therapy is a Korean manual therapy widely used primarily for low back pain (LBP)-related disorders in Korea, well-designed studies on the comparative effectiveness ofChuna manual therapy are scarce. Methods/design This study is the protocol for a three-armed, multicenter, pragmatic randomized controlled pilot trial. Sixty severe nonacute LBP patients (pain duration of at least 3 weeks, Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) ≥5) will be recruited at four Korean medicine hospitals. Participants will be randomly allocated to theChuna group (n = 20), usual care group (n = 20), orChuna plus usual care group (n = 20) for 6 weeks of treatment. Usual care will consist of orally administered conventional medicine, physical therapy, and back pain care education. The trial will be conducted with outcome assessor and statistician blinding. The primary endpoint will be NRS of LBP at week 7 post randomization. Secondary outcomes include NRS of leg pain, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), the Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire, lumbar range of motion (ROM), the EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) health survey, the Health Utility Index III (HUI-III), and economic evaluation and safety data. Post-treatment follow-ups will be conducted at 1, 4, and 10 weeks after conclusion of treatment. Discussion This study will assess the comparative effectiveness ofChuna manual therapy compared to conventional usual care. Costs and effectiveness (utility) data will be analyzed for exploratory cost-effectiveness analysis. If this pilot study does not reach a definite conclusion due to its small sample size, these results will be used as preliminary results to calculate sample size for future large-scale clinical trials and contribute in the assessment of feasibility of a full-scale multicenter trial. Trial registration Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS), KCT0001850 . Registered on 17 March 2016.