An assessment of important SPECIATE profiles in the EPA emissions modeling platform and current data gaps. (15th June 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bray, Casey D.; Strum, Madeleine; Simon, Heather; Riddick, Lee; Kosusko, Mike; Menetrez, Marc; Hays, Michael D.; Rao, Venkatesh
• Is Part Of: Atmospheric environment. Volume 207(2019)
• Page Start: 93
• Page End: 104
• Publication Date: 2019-06-15
• Subjects: SPECIATE -- VOC speciation -- PM2.5 speciation -- VOC -- PM2.5; Air -- Pollution -- Periodicals; Air -- Pollution -- Meteorological aspects -- Periodicals; 551.51
• DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.03.013
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1352-2310

Abstract

Abstract: The United States (US) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)'s SPECIATE database contains speciated particulate matter (PM) and volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions profiles. Emissions profiles from anthropogenic combustion, industry, wildfires, and agricultural sources among others are key inputs for creating chemically-resolved emissions inventories for air quality modeling. While the database and its use for air quality modeling are routinely updated and evaluated, this work sets out to systematically prioritize future improvements and communicate speciation data needs to the research community. We first identify the most prominent profiles (PM and VOC) used in the EPA's 2014 emissions modeling platform based on PM mass and VOC mass and reactivity. It is important to note that the on-road profiles were excluded from this analysis since speciation for these profiles is computed internally in the MOVES model. We then investigate these profiles further for quality and to determine whether they were being appropriately matched to source types while also considering regional variability of speciated pollutants. We then applied a quantitative needs assessment ranking system which rates the profile based on age, appropriateness (i.e. is the profile being used appropriately), prevalence in the EPA modeling platform and the quality of the reference. Our analysis shows that the highest ranked profiles (e.g. profile assignments with the highest priority for updates) include PM2.5 profiles for fires (prescribed, agricultural and wild) and VOC profiles for crude oil storage tanks and residential wood combustion of pine wood. Top ranked profiles may indicate either that there are problems with the currently available source testing or that current mappings of profiles to source categories within EPA's modeling platform need improvement. Through this process, we have identified 29 emissions source categories that would benefit from updated mapping. Many of these mapping mismatches are due to lack of emissions testing for appropriate source categories. In addition, we conclude that new source emissions testing would be especially beneficial for residential wood combustion, nonroad gasoline exhaust and nonroad diesel equipment. Highlights: Profiles assigned to the largest amount of emitted mass are for biomass burning. The most common concern for profiles is source appropriateness. Highest priority PM2.5 profile is the wildfire composite profile. Highest priority VOC profile is the profile for fireplace wood combustion (pine wood).