Drowsiness measures for commercial motor vehicle operations. (May 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sparrow, Amy R.; LaJambe, Cynthia M.; Van Dongen, Hans P.A.
• Is Part Of: Accident analysis and prevention. Volume 126(2019)
• Page Start: 146
• Page End: 159
• Publication Date: 2019-05
• Subjects: Crash risk -- Fatigue -- Sleepiness -- Alertness -- Lane deviation -- Automation; Accidents -- Prevention -- Periodicals; Accident Prevention -- Periodicals; Accidents -- Prévention -- Périodiques; 363.106
• DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.04.020
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0001-4575

Abstract

Highlights: Drowsiness measures vary markedly in their ability to predict performance deficits. Transient effects from external circumstances and behaviors may mask drowsiness. Drivers differ in their vulnerability to performance impairment from drowsiness. Progressive driving automation increases the need for reliable drowsiness detection. Model predictions based on composite measures show promise for drowsiness detection. Abstract: Timely detection of drowsiness in Commercial Motor Vehicle (C MV) operations is necessary to reduce drowsiness-related CMV crashes. This is relevant for manual driving and, paradoxically, even more so with increasing levels of driving automation. Measures available for drowsiness detection vary in reliability, validity, usability, and effectiveness. Passively recorded physiologic measures such as electroencephalography (EEG) and a variety of ocular parameters tend to accurately identify states of considerable drowsiness, but are limited in their potential to detect lower levels of drowsiness. They also do not correlate well with measures of driver performance. Objective measures of vigilant attention performance capture drowsiness reliably, but they require active driver involvement in a performance task and are prone to confounds from distraction and (lack of) motivation. Embedded performance measures of actual driving, such as lane deviation, have been found to correlate with physiologic and vigilance performance measures, yet to what extent drowsiness levels can be derived from them reliably remains a topic of investigation. Transient effects from external circumstances and behaviors – such as task load, light exposure, physical activity, and caffeine intake – may mask a driver's underlying state of drowsiness. Also, drivers differ in the degree to which drowsiness affects their driving performance, based on trait vulnerability as well as age. This paper provides a broad overview of the current science pertinent to a range of drowsiness measures, with an emphasis on those that may be most relevant for CMV operations. There is a need for smart technologies that in a transparent manner combine different measurement modalities with mathematical representations of the neurobiological processes driving drowsiness, that account for various mediators and confounds, and that are appropriately adapted to the individual driver. The research for and development of such technologies requires a multi-disciplinary approach and significant resources, but is technically within reach.