Reintroducing rewilding to restoration – Rejecting the search for novelty. (May 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Reintroducing rewilding to restoration – Rejecting the search for novelty. (May 2019)
- Main Title:
- Reintroducing rewilding to restoration – Rejecting the search for novelty
- Authors:
- Hayward, Matt W.
Scanlon, Robert J.
Callen, Alexandra
Howell, Lachlan G.
Klop-Toker, Kaya L.
Di Blanco, Yamil
Balkenhol, Niko
Bugir, Cassandra K.
Campbell, Lachlan
Caravaggi, Anthony
Chalmers, Anita C.
Clulow, John
Clulow, Simon
Cross, Paul
Gould, John A.
Griffin, Andrea S.
Heurich, Marco
Howe, Belinda K.
Jachowski, David S.
Jhala, Yadvendradev V.
Krishnamurthy, Ramesh
Kowalczyk, Rafał
Lenga, Dean J.
Linnell, John D.C.
Marnewick, Kelly A.
Moehrenschlager, Axel
Montgomery, Robert A.
Osipova, Liudmila
Peneaux, Chloe
Rodger, John C.
Sales, Lilian P.
Seeto, Rebecca G.Y.
Shuttleworth, Craig M.
Somers, Michael J.
Tamessar, Cottrell T.
Upton, Rose M.O.
Weise, Florian J.
… (more) - Abstract:
- Abstract: Rewilding is emerging as a major issue in conservation. However, there are currently a dozen definitions of rewilding that include Pleistocene rewilding, island rewilding, trophic rewilding, functional rewilding and passive rewilding, and these remain fuzzy, lack clarity and, hence, hinder scientific discourse. Based on current definitions, it is unclear how the interventions described under the rewilding umbrella differ from those framed within the long-standing term 'restoration'. Even projects held up as iconic rewilding endeavours invariably began as restoration projects (e.g., Oostvaaderplassen; Pleistocene Park; the return of wolves to Yellowstone, etc.). Similarly, rewilding organisations (e.g., Rewilding Europe) typically began with a restoration focus. Scientific discourse requires precise language. The fuzziness of existing definitions of rewilding and lack of distinction from restoration practices means that scientific messages cannot be transferred accurately to a policy or practice framework. We suggest that the utility of 'rewilding' as a term is obsolete, and hence recommend scientists and practitioners use 'restoration' instead. Highlights: The term 'rewilding' has over a dozen definitions and existing 'rewilding' projects invariably began as restoration projects. All existing 'rewilding' definitions fit within existing definitions of the long-established field of restoration. Fuzzy and vague definitions impinge upon scientific progress. WeAbstract: Rewilding is emerging as a major issue in conservation. However, there are currently a dozen definitions of rewilding that include Pleistocene rewilding, island rewilding, trophic rewilding, functional rewilding and passive rewilding, and these remain fuzzy, lack clarity and, hence, hinder scientific discourse. Based on current definitions, it is unclear how the interventions described under the rewilding umbrella differ from those framed within the long-standing term 'restoration'. Even projects held up as iconic rewilding endeavours invariably began as restoration projects (e.g., Oostvaaderplassen; Pleistocene Park; the return of wolves to Yellowstone, etc.). Similarly, rewilding organisations (e.g., Rewilding Europe) typically began with a restoration focus. Scientific discourse requires precise language. The fuzziness of existing definitions of rewilding and lack of distinction from restoration practices means that scientific messages cannot be transferred accurately to a policy or practice framework. We suggest that the utility of 'rewilding' as a term is obsolete, and hence recommend scientists and practitioners use 'restoration' instead. Highlights: The term 'rewilding' has over a dozen definitions and existing 'rewilding' projects invariably began as restoration projects. All existing 'rewilding' definitions fit within existing definitions of the long-established field of restoration. Fuzzy and vague definitions impinge upon scientific progress. We recommend using the clearly defined term restoration instead of rewilding. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Biological conservation. Volume 233(2019)
- Journal:
- Biological conservation
- Issue:
- Volume 233(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 233, Issue 2019 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 233
- Issue:
- 2019
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0233-2019-0000
- Page Start:
- 255
- Page End:
- 259
- Publication Date:
- 2019-05
- Subjects:
- Rewilding -- Pleistocene -- Island -- Restoration -- Restore -- Ecological equivalent species -- Reinforcement -- Reintroduction -- Novel ecosystems -- Conservation translocation -- Ecological replacement -- Assisted colonisation
Conservation of natural resources -- Periodicals
Nature conservation -- Periodicals
Ecology -- Periodicals
Environment -- Periodicals
Environmental Pollution -- Periodicals
Electronic journals
333.9516 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00063207 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.03.011 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0006-3207
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2075.100000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 9983.xml