Glenoid morphology in light of anatomical and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a dissection- and 3D-CT-based study in male and female body donors. Issue 1 (December 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mathews, Sandra; Burkhard, Marco; Serrano, Nabil; Link, Karl; Häusler, Martin; Frater, Nakita; Franke, Ingeborg; Bischofberger, Helena; Buck, Florian; Gascho, Dominic; Thali, Michael; Serowy, Steffen; Müller-Gerbl, Magdalena; Harper, Gareth; Qureshi, Ford; Böni, Thomas; Bloch, Hans-Rudolf; Ullrich, Oliver; Rühli, Frank-Jakobus; Eppler, Elisabeth
• Is Part Of: BMC musculoskeletal disorders. Volume 18:Issue 1(2017)
• Page Start: 1
• Page End: 11
• Publication Date: 2017-12
• Subjects: Anatomical and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty -- Suprascapular nerve -- Screw placement -- Glenoid cavity -- Anteversion angle -- Retroversion angle -- Inclination angle -- Dissection study; Musculoskeletal system -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.705
• DOI: 10.1186/s12891-016-1373-4
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1471-2474

Abstract

Abstract Background Placement of the glenoid baseplate is of paramount importance for the outcome of anatomical and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. However, the database around glenoid size is poor, particularly regarding small scapulae, for example, in women and smaller individuals, and is derived from different methodological approaches. In this multimodality cadaver study, we systematically examined the glenoid using morphological and 3D-CT measurements. Methods Measurements of the glenoid and drill hole tunnel length for superior baseplate screw placement were recorded to define size of the glenoid and the distance to the scapular notch on cadaveric specimens. Glenoid angles were determined on both, 3D-CT-scans of the thoraxes using the Friedman method and on subsequently isolated scapulae from 18 male and female donors (average 84 years, range 60–98 years). Results Mean glenoid height was 36.6 mm ± 3.6, and width 27.8 mm ± 3.1 with a significant sex dimorphism (p ≤ 0.001): in males, glenoid height 39.5 mm ± 3.5, and width 30.3 mm ± 3.3, and in females, glenoid height 34.8 mm ± 2.2, and width 26.2 mm ± 1.6. The average distance from the superior screw entry to its exit in the scapular notch measured by calliper was 27.2 mm ± 6.0 with a sex difference: in males, 29.4 mm ± 5.7, and in females, 25.8 mm ± 5.9 mm with a minimum recorded distance of 15 mm. Measured by CT, the mean inclination angle for male and female donors combined was 13.0° ± 7.0, and the ante-/retroversion angle −1.0° ± 4.0°. Conclusion This study is one of the first to combine dissection, including drill holes, with anatomical measurements and radiological data. In some women and smaller individuals, smaller baseplates should be selected. The published safe zone of 20 mm is generally feasible for superior screw placement, however, in small patients this distance may be substantially shorter than expected and start as of 13 and 15 mm, respectively. No correlation between glenoid height or width with the length of our drilling canal towards the scapular notch was found. Preoperative CT-based treatment planning to determine version and inclination angles is recommended.