Evaluation of the local carcinogenic potential of mesh used in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Issue 9 (September 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Linder, Brian; Trabuco, Emanuel; Carranza, Daniel; Gebhart, John; Klingele, Christopher; Occhino, John
• Is Part Of: International urogynecology journal. Volume 27:Issue 9(2016)
• Page Start: 1333
• Page End: 1336
• Publication Date: 2016-09
• Subjects: Midurethral sling -- Complication -- Cancer -- Carcinogenesis; Urogynecology -- Periodicals; Generative organs, Female -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.60082
• DOI: 10.1007/s00192-016-2961-4
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0937-3462

Abstract

Abstract Introduction and hypothesis To evaluate the carcinogenic potential of implanted synthetic mesh midurethral slings in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Methods We identified female patients undergoing implantation of mesh materials for stress urinary incontinence at our institution from 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2012. This was accomplished by querying the medical records for CPT code 57288 ("sling operation for stress incontinence") and a subsequent chart review to identify patients who underwent synthetic mesh sling placement. Medical records were then evaluated for the documentation of bladder, urethral, vaginal, cervical, uterine or ovarian cancers via the International Classification of Disease (ninth edition) coding. A chart review of patients with a cancer diagnosis was performed for verification of the diagnosis and evaluation of the temporal relationship with sling placement. Results During the study period, 2, 474 patients underwent polypropylene midurethral sling placement. The median age was 57 years (IQR 47, 69) and the median follow-up was 60 months (IQR 23.3, 94.9). Overall, 51 patients also had a cancer diagnosis (8 bladder cancers, 7 vaginal malignancies, 8 ovarian carcinomas, 26 endometrial cancers, 2 cervical malignancies); however, only 2 cancers (0.08 %, 2 out of 2, 474) developed following sling placement (a vaginal melanoma 3 years after sling placement and an ovarian tumor 1 year after sling placement). No cases of sarcoma formation, bladder, urethral or squamous cell carcinomas were identified. Conclusions With a median follow-up of 5 years after synthetic midurethral sling placement, development of pelvic malignancy was rare (0.08 %) and unlikely to be secondary to foreign body reaction from the implanted material.