Combining functional electrical stimulation and mirror therapy for upper limb motor recovery following stroke: a randomised trial. (2nd October 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mathieson, Sean; Parsons, John; Kaplan, Michael; Parsons, Matthew
• Is Part Of: European journal of physiotherapy. Volume 20:Number 4(2018)
• Page Start: 244
• Page End: 249
• Publication Date: 2018-10-02
• Subjects: Stroke -- rehabilitation -- physiotherapy -- electrotherapy -- motor learning -- motor recovery; Therapeutics, Physiological -- Periodicals; Physical therapy -- Periodicals; 615.8205
• DOI: 10.1080/21679169.2018.1472635
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2167-9169

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: There is a growing need to develop effective rehabilitation interventions for people presenting with stroke as healthcare services experience ever-increasing pressures on staff and resources. The primary objective of this research is to examine the effect that mirror therapy combined with functional electrical stimulation has on upper limb motor recovery and functional outcome for a sample of people admitted to an inpatient stroke unit. Methods: A total of 50 participants were randomised to one of three treatment arms; Functional Electrical Stimulation, Mirror therapy or a combined intervention of Functional Electrical Stimulation with Mirror therapy. Socio-demographic and health information was collected at recruitment together with admission dates, medical diagnoses and baseline measures. Blinded assessments were undertaken at baseline and at discharge post-stroke by a registered physiotherapist and a clinical nurse specialist. Results: The Action Research Arm Test and the Fugl–Meyer Upper Extremity assessment revealed statistically superior results for Functional Electrical Stimulation compared with Mirror therapy alone ( p = 0.03). There were no other significant differences between the three groups. Conclusion: The theory of combining interventions requires further investigation and warrants further research. Combining current interventions may have the potential to enhance stroke rehabilitation, improve functional outcomes and help reduce the overall burden of stroke.