Are early first trimester weights valid proxies for preconception weight?. Issue 1 (December 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Are early first trimester weights valid proxies for preconception weight?. Issue 1 (December 2016)
- Main Title:
- Are early first trimester weights valid proxies for preconception weight?
- Authors:
- Krukowski, Rebecca
West, Delia
DiCarlo, Marisha
Shankar, Kartik
Cleves, Mario
Saylors, Marie
Andres, Aline - Abstract:
- Abstract Background An accurate estimate of preconception weight is necessary for providing a gestational weight gain range based on the Institute of Medicine's guidelines; however, an accurate and proximal preconception weight is not available for most women. We examined the validity of first trimester weights for estimating preconception body mass index category. Methods Under identical measurement conditions, preconception weight and two first trimester weights (i.e., 4–10 and 12 weeks gestation) were obtained (n = 43). Results The 4–10 week and the 12 week weight correctly classified 95 and 91% women, respectively. Mean weight changes were relatively small overall (M = 0.74 ± 1.99 kg at 4–10 weeks andM = 1.02 ± 2.46 at 12 weeks). There was a significant difference in mean weight gain by body mass index category at 4–10 weeks (−0.09 ± 1.86 kg for normal weight participants vs. 1.61 + 1.76 kg for overweight/obese participants, p = 0.01), but not at 12 weeks (0.53 ± 2.29 kg for normal weight participants vs. 1.54 ± 2.58 kg for overweight/obese participants). Conclusions Assigning gestational weight gain guidelines based on an early first trimester weight resulted in 5–9% of women being misclassified depending on the gestational week the weight was obtained. Thus, most women are correctly classified based on a first trimester weight, particularly an early first trimester weight, although it is possible that modeling strategies could be developed to further improveAbstract Background An accurate estimate of preconception weight is necessary for providing a gestational weight gain range based on the Institute of Medicine's guidelines; however, an accurate and proximal preconception weight is not available for most women. We examined the validity of first trimester weights for estimating preconception body mass index category. Methods Under identical measurement conditions, preconception weight and two first trimester weights (i.e., 4–10 and 12 weeks gestation) were obtained (n = 43). Results The 4–10 week and the 12 week weight correctly classified 95 and 91% women, respectively. Mean weight changes were relatively small overall (M = 0.74 ± 1.99 kg at 4–10 weeks andM = 1.02 ± 2.46 at 12 weeks). There was a significant difference in mean weight gain by body mass index category at 4–10 weeks (−0.09 ± 1.86 kg for normal weight participants vs. 1.61 + 1.76 kg for overweight/obese participants, p = 0.01), but not at 12 weeks (0.53 ± 2.29 kg for normal weight participants vs. 1.54 ± 2.58 kg for overweight/obese participants). Conclusions Assigning gestational weight gain guidelines based on an early first trimester weight resulted in 5–9% of women being misclassified depending on the gestational week the weight was obtained. Thus, most women are correctly classified based on a first trimester weight, particularly an early first trimester weight, although it is possible that modeling strategies could be developed to further improve estimates of preconception body mass index category. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov #NCT01131117, registered May 25, 2010. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- BMC pregnancy and childbirth. Volume 16:Issue 1(2016)
- Journal:
- BMC pregnancy and childbirth
- Issue:
- Volume 16:Issue 1(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 16, Issue 1 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 16
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0016-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 1
- Page End:
- 6
- Publication Date:
- 2016-12
- Subjects:
- Obesity -- Obstetrics -- Preventive medicine
Pregnancy -- Periodicals
Childbirth -- Periodicals
Obstetrics -- Periodicals
618.2005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcpregnancychildbirth/ ↗
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/tocrender.fcgi?journal=61 ↗
http://link.springer.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1186/s12884-016-1159-6 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1471-2393
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 9962.xml