Children's Mental Health Need and Expenditures in Ontario: Findings from the 2014 Ontario Child Health Study. (April 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Duncan, Laura; Georgiades, Katholiki; Birch, Stephen; Comeau, Jinette; Wang, Li; Boyle, Michael H.
• Is Part Of: Canadian journal of psychiatry =. Volume 64:Number 4(2019)
• Page Start: 275
• Page End: 284
• Publication Date: 2019-04
• Subjects: mental health need -- children -- services -- expenditures -- Ontario -- funding formula; Psychiatry -- Periodicals; Psychiatry -- Canada -- Periodicals; 616.8900971
• DOI: 10.1177/0706743719830036
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0706-7437

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the alignment between the Ontario Ministry of Children and Youth Services (MCYS) expenditures for children's mental health services and population need, and to quantify the value of adjusting for need in addition to population size in formula-based expenditure allocations. Two need definitions are used: "assessed need, " as the presence of a mental disorder, and "perceived need, " as the subjective perception of a mental health problem. Methods: Children's mental health need and service contact estimates (from the 2014 Ontario Child Health Study), expenditure data (from government administrative data), and population counts (from the 2011 Canadian Census) were combined to generate formula-based expenditure allocations based on 1) population size and 2) need (population size adjusted for levels of need). Allocations were compared at the service area and region level and for the 2 need definitions (assessed and perceived). Results: Comparisons were made for 13 of 33 MCYS service areas and all 5 regions. The percentage of MCYS expenditure reallocation needed to achieve an allocation based on assessed need was 25.5% at the service area level and 25.6% at the region level. Based on perceived need, these amounts were 19.4% and 27.2%, respectively. The value of needs-adjustment ranged from 8.0% to 22.7% of total expenditures, depending on the definition of need. Conclusion: Making needs adjustments to population counts using population estimates of children's mental health need (assessed or perceived) provides additional value for informing and evaluating allocation decisions. This study provides much-needed and current information about the match between expenditures and children's mental health need.