Comparing Visual and Statistical Analysis of Multiple Baseline Design Graphs. Issue 3 (May 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wolfe, Katie; Dickenson, Tammiee S.; Miller, Bridget; McGrath, Kathleen V.
• Is Part Of: Behavior modification. Volume 43:Issue 3(2019)
• Page Start: 361
• Page End: 388
• Publication Date: 2019-05
• Subjects: single-case designs -- visual analysis -- statistical analysis -- effect size; Behavior modification -- Periodicals; Behavior therapy -- Periodicals; 153.85
• DOI: 10.1177/0145445518768723
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0145-4455

Abstract

A growing number of statistical analyses are being developed for single-case research. One important factor in evaluating these methods is the extent to which each corresponds to visual analysis. Few studies have compared statistical and visual analysis, and information about more recently developed statistics is scarce. Therefore, our purpose was to evaluate the agreement between visual analysis and four statistical analyses: improvement rate difference (IRD); Tau-U; Hedges, Pustejovsky, Shadish (HPS) effect size; and between-case standardized mean difference (BC-SMD). Results indicate that IRD and BC-SMD had the strongest overall agreement with visual analysis. Although Tau-U had strong agreement with visual analysis on raw values, it had poorer agreement when those values were dichotomized to represent the presence or absence of a functional relation. Overall, visual analysis appeared to be more conservative than statistical analysis, but further research is needed to evaluate the nature of these disagreements.