Educational, employment, and social participation of young adult graduates from the paediatric Southern Cochlear Implant Programme, New Zealand. (2nd January 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Goh, Terence; Bird, Philip; Pearson, John; Mustard, Jill
• Is Part Of: Cochlear implants international. Volume 17:Number 1(2016)
• Page Start: 31
• Page End: 51
• Publication Date: 2016-01-02
• Subjects: Cochlear implant -- Paediatric -- Quality of life -- Hearing identity -- Education -- Employment -- Social participation; Cochlear implants -- Periodicals; 617.882
• DOI: 10.1179/1754762815Y.0000000018
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1467-0100

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives : The purpose of this study is to observe the education and vocational achievements and social participation of cochlear implant recipients as they graduate from a paediatric cochlear implant programme and identify any significant associations that might exist. Method : This study identified 56 patients from the Southern Cochlear Implant Programme (SCIP) who received cochlear implants before the age of 19 (paediatric) and are now over the age of 19 (adult). A questionnaire investigated their education, employment, and identity with the hearing and deaf communities. Also included were the satisfaction with life scale and Hearing Participation Scale (HPS). Subjects ranged in age from 19 to 32. Results : Twenty-six patients responded to the questionnaire, including one non-user. Twenty identified strongly or very strongly with the hearing community. There was weak evidence of a linear association between strong identity with the hearing community and a higher HPS score. No other statistically significant associations were detected. Interestingly, 12 out of 26 participants found employment through family. Conclusion : Positive outcome trends in education and employment were seen in this study although no statistical significance was achieved. There is a strong bias for those who use their cochlear implants regularly, and there are no data available for those who do not use their cochlear implants for comparison as only one non-user completed the survey, despite efforts to include this group. This study shows that there is perceived benefit in implantation for patients who use it regularly but further research is needed with a more diverse group of cochlear implant recipients.