Agreement between physicians' and nurses' clinical decisions for the management of the fracture liaison service (4iFLS): the Lucky Bone™ program. Issue 4 (April 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Agreement between physicians' and nurses' clinical decisions for the management of the fracture liaison service (4iFLS): the Lucky Bone™ program. Issue 4 (April 2016)
- Main Title:
- Agreement between physicians' and nurses' clinical decisions for the management of the fracture liaison service (4iFLS): the Lucky Bone™ program
- Authors:
- Senay, A.
Delisle, J.
Raynauld, J.
Morin, S.
Fernandes, J. - Abstract:
- Abstract Summary We determined if nurses can manage osteoporotic fractures in a fracture liaison service by asking a rheumatologist and an internist to assess their clinical decisions. Experts agreed on more than 94 % of all nurses' actions for 525 fragility fracture patients, showing that their management is efficient and safe. Introduction A major care gap exists in the investigation of bone fragility and initiation of treatment for individuals who have sustained a fragility fracture. The implementation of a fracture liaison service (FLS) managed by nurses could be the key in resolving this problem. The aim of this project was to obtain agreement between physicians' and nurses' clinical decisions and evaluate if the algorithm of care is efficient and reliable for the management of a FLS. Methods Clinical decisions of nurses for 525 subjects in a fracture liaison service between 2010 and 2013 were assessed by two independent physicians with expertise in osteoporosis treatment. Results Nurses succeeded in identifying all patients at risk and needed to refer 27 % of patients to an MD. Thereby, they managed autonomously 73 % of fragility fracture patients. No needless referrals were made according to assessing physicians. Agreement between each evaluator and nurses was of >97 %. Physicians' decisions were the same in >96 %, and Gwet AC11 coefficient was of >0.960 (almost perfect level of agreement). All major comorbidities were adequately managed. Conclusions High agreementAbstract Summary We determined if nurses can manage osteoporotic fractures in a fracture liaison service by asking a rheumatologist and an internist to assess their clinical decisions. Experts agreed on more than 94 % of all nurses' actions for 525 fragility fracture patients, showing that their management is efficient and safe. Introduction A major care gap exists in the investigation of bone fragility and initiation of treatment for individuals who have sustained a fragility fracture. The implementation of a fracture liaison service (FLS) managed by nurses could be the key in resolving this problem. The aim of this project was to obtain agreement between physicians' and nurses' clinical decisions and evaluate if the algorithm of care is efficient and reliable for the management of a FLS. Methods Clinical decisions of nurses for 525 subjects in a fracture liaison service between 2010 and 2013 were assessed by two independent physicians with expertise in osteoporosis treatment. Results Nurses succeeded in identifying all patients at risk and needed to refer 27 % of patients to an MD. Thereby, they managed autonomously 73 % of fragility fracture patients. No needless referrals were made according to assessing physicians. Agreement between each evaluator and nurses was of >97 %. Physicians' decisions were the same in >96 %, and Gwet AC11 coefficient was of >0.960 (almost perfect level of agreement). All major comorbidities were adequately managed. Conclusions High agreement between nurses' and physicians' clinical decisions indicate that the independent management by nurses of a fracture liaison service is safe and should strongly be recommended in the care of patients with a fragility fracture. This kind of intervention could help resolve the existing care gap in bone fragility care as well as the societal economic burden associated with prevention and treatment of fragility fractures. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Osteoporosis international. Volume 27:Issue 4(2016)
- Journal:
- Osteoporosis international
- Issue:
- Volume 27:Issue 4(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 27, Issue 4 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 27
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0027-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- 1569
- Page End:
- 1576
- Publication Date:
- 2016-04
- Subjects:
- Fracture liaison service -- Fragility fracture -- Management -- Nurse -- Osteoporosis
Osteoporosis -- Periodicals
Bones -- Metabolism -- Disorders -- Periodicals
616.716005 - Journal URLs:
- http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://www.springerlink.com/content/102828 ↗
http://www.springer.com/gb/ ↗
http://www.springer.com/gb/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1007/s00198-015-3413-6 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0937-941X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6303.873500
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 9947.xml