Bond‐valence model for metal cluster compounds. I. Common lattice strains. Issue 5 (26th February 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Levi, Elena; Aurbach, Doron; Isnard, Olivier
• Is Part Of: Acta crystallographica. Volume 69:Issue 5(2013:Oct.)
• Page Start: 419
• Page End: 425
• Publication Date: 2016-02-26
• Subjects: cluster compounds -- bond‐valence parameters -- lattice strains
• DOI: 10.1107/S2052519213021271
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2052-5206

Abstract

Abstract : The bond‐valence model was commonly considered as inappropriate to metal cluster compounds, but recently it was shown that the model provides unique information on the lattice strains and stabilization mechanisms in (TM)6 ‐chalcohalides (TM = transition metal in the cluster). The previous study was mainly devoted to the non‐uniform distribution of the anion valences (bond‐valence sums) around clusters. This and the following paper focuses on two additional phenomena: (i) a steric conflict between counter‐cations and the cluster–ligand framework resulting in `common' lattice strains (this paper), and (ii) steric conflict between the small (TM)6 ‐cluster and the large coordination polyhedron around the cluster or so‐called matrix effect [the next paper; Levi et al. (2013), Acta Cryst. B69, 426–438]. It was shown that both phenomena can be well described by changes in the bond‐valence parameters. The calculations were based on the structural data known to date for a variety of (TM)6 ‐cluster compounds, Mx (TM)6 Ly (TM = Nb, Mo, W and Re; M = various additional cations, L = the chalcogen and/or halogen ligands). The results were used to explain the structural peculiarities of these compounds with remarkable physical properties and the mechanisms of their stabilization.