Resilience from the ground up: how are local resilience perceptions and global frameworks aligned?. (4th April 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Beauchamp, Emilie; Abdella, Jennifer; Fisher, Susannah; McPeak, John; Patnaik, Hannah; Koulibaly, Papa; Cissé, Daouda; Touré, Mamadou; Bocoum, Aly; Ndao, Momath; Deme, Yacouba; Gueye, Bara
• Other Names: Wilkinson Emily guestEditor.
• Is Part Of: Disasters. Volume 43(2019)Supplement 3
• Page Start: S295
• Page End: S317
• Publication Date: 2019-04-04
• Subjects: climate adaptation -- food security -- resilience -- Sahel -- subjective indicators -- well‐being; Disasters -- Periodicals; Disaster relief -- Periodicals; Emergency management -- Periodicals; 363.34
• DOI: 10.1111/disa.12342
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0361-3666

Abstract

Abstract : Numerous resilience measurement frameworks for climate programmes have emerged over the past decade to operationalise the concept and aggregate results within and between programmes. Proxies of resilience, including subjective measures using perception data, have been proposed to measure resilience, but there is limited evidence on their validity and use for policy and practice. This article draws on research on the Decentralising Climate Funds project of the Building Resilience and Adaptation to Climate Extremes and Disasters programme, which supports communities in Mali and Senegal to improve climate resilience through locally controlled adaptation funds. It explores attributes of resilience from this bottom‐up perspective to assess its predictors and alignment with food security, as a proxy of well‐being. We find different patterns when comparing resilience and the well‐being proxy, illustrating that the interplay between the two is still unclear. Results also point to the importance of contextualising resilience, raising implications for aggregating results.