Women's perceptions of antenatal care: are we following guideline recommended care?. Issue 1 (December 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Women's perceptions of antenatal care: are we following guideline recommended care?. Issue 1 (December 2016)
- Main Title:
- Women's perceptions of antenatal care: are we following guideline recommended care?
- Authors:
- Waller, Amy
Bryant, Jamie
Cameron, Emilie
Galal, Mohamed
Quay, Juliana
Sanson-Fisher, Rob - Abstract:
- Abstract Background Detection and management of antenatal risk factors is critical for improved maternal and infant outcomes. This study describes the proportion of pregnant women who self-reported being screened for and offered advice to manage antenatal risk factors in line with antenatal care recommendations; and the characteristics associated with rates of screening. Methods A survey was undertaken with 223 (64 % of eligible) pregnant women recruited from an outpatient obstetrics clinic at a public hospital. Participants self-reported whether they were: (i) screened for 23 guideline-recommended risk factors during their antenatal visit; (ii) offered assistance to manage identified risk factor(s); and (iii) received assistance that was of benefit. Association between rate of screening and participant characteristics was examined using multivariate quantile regression. Results Overall, 23 % of women reported that they were asked about every risk factor. Weight gain (48 %), diet (60 %) and oral health (31 %) were least frequently screened risk factors. The number of women who reported they were offered advice to manage identified risks and the value of that advice was perceived by women as suboptimal. Those women receiving shared care between a midwife and general practitioner, of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander descent, and without private health insurance reported being screened for a greater number of risk factors. Conclusions Pregnant women report suboptimal ratesAbstract Background Detection and management of antenatal risk factors is critical for improved maternal and infant outcomes. This study describes the proportion of pregnant women who self-reported being screened for and offered advice to manage antenatal risk factors in line with antenatal care recommendations; and the characteristics associated with rates of screening. Methods A survey was undertaken with 223 (64 % of eligible) pregnant women recruited from an outpatient obstetrics clinic at a public hospital. Participants self-reported whether they were: (i) screened for 23 guideline-recommended risk factors during their antenatal visit; (ii) offered assistance to manage identified risk factor(s); and (iii) received assistance that was of benefit. Association between rate of screening and participant characteristics was examined using multivariate quantile regression. Results Overall, 23 % of women reported that they were asked about every risk factor. Weight gain (48 %), diet (60 %) and oral health (31 %) were least frequently screened risk factors. The number of women who reported they were offered advice to manage identified risks and the value of that advice was perceived by women as suboptimal. Those women receiving shared care between a midwife and general practitioner, of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander descent, and without private health insurance reported being screened for a greater number of risk factors. Conclusions Pregnant women report suboptimal rates of screening and management of antenatal risk factors. Initiatives to improve consistency in detection of antenatal risk factors and the application of appropriate interventions to manage those risk factors that are detected are required. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- BMC pregnancy and childbirth. Volume 16:Issue 1(2016)
- Journal:
- BMC pregnancy and childbirth
- Issue:
- Volume 16:Issue 1(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 16, Issue 1 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 16
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0016-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 1
- Page End:
- 10
- Publication Date:
- 2016-12
- Subjects:
- Antenatal -- Guidelines -- Implementation -- Screening -- Pregnancy
Pregnancy -- Periodicals
Childbirth -- Periodicals
Obstetrics -- Periodicals
618.2005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcpregnancychildbirth/ ↗
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/tocrender.fcgi?journal=61 ↗
http://link.springer.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1186/s12884-016-0984-y ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1471-2393
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 9926.xml