2D/3D registration algorithm for lung brachytherapy. Issue 2 (31st January 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Zvonarev, P. S.; Farrell, T. J.; Hunter, R.; Wierzbicki, M.; Hayward, J. E.; Sur, R. K.
• Is Part Of: Medical physics. Volume 40:Issue 2(2013)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2013-01-31
• Subjects: Therapeutic applications, including brachytherapy -- Registration -- Computed tomography; brachytherapy -- catheters -- computerised tomography -- data analysis -- image matching -- image registration -- lung -- medical image processing -- phantoms; 2D/3D registration -- lung brachytherapy -- computed tomography; Computerised tomographs -- Catheters; Hollow probes -- Radiation therapy -- Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications -- Image data processing or generation, in general; Medical imaging -- Medical X‐ray imaging -- Computed tomography -- X‐ray imaging -- Lungs -- Brachytherapy -- Dosimetry -- Digitization -- Image registration -- Cancer; Medical physics -- Periodicals; Medical physics; Geneeskunde; Natuurkunde; Toepassingen; Biophysics; Periodicals; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 610.153
• DOI: 10.1118/1.4788663
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0094-2405

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: : A 2D/3D registration algorithm is proposed for registering orthogonal x‐ray images with a diagnostic CT volume for high dose rate (HDR) lung brachytherapy. Methods: : The algorithm utilizes a rigid registration model based on a pixel/voxel intensity matching approach. To achieve accurate registration, a robust similarity measure combining normalized mutual information, image gradient, and intensity difference was developed. The algorithm was validated using a simple body and anthropomorphic phantoms. Transfer catheters were placed inside the phantoms to simulate the unique image features observed during treatment. The algorithm sensitivity to various degrees of initial misregistration and to the presence of foreign objects, such as ECG leads, was evaluated. Results: : The mean registration error was 2.2 and 1.9 mm for the simple body and anthropomorphic phantoms, respectively. The error was comparable to the interoperator catheter digitization error of 1.6 mm. Preliminary analysis of data acquired from four patients indicated a mean registration error of 4.2 mm. Conclusions: : Results obtained using the proposed algorithm are clinically acceptable especially considering the complications normally encountered when imaging during lung HDR brachytherapy.