Re-irradiation for locoregionally recurrent tumors of the thorax: a single-institution, retrospective study. Issue 1 (December 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Re-irradiation for locoregionally recurrent tumors of the thorax: a single-institution, retrospective study. Issue 1 (December 2016)
- Main Title:
- Re-irradiation for locoregionally recurrent tumors of the thorax: a single-institution, retrospective study
- Authors:
- Sumita, Kiyomi
Harada, Hideyuki
Asakura, Hirofumi
Ogawa, Hirofumi
Onoe, Tsuyoshi
Murayama, Shigeyuki
Nakamura, Satoaki
Tanigawa, Noboru
Takahashi, Toshiaki
Nishimura, Tetsuo - Abstract:
- Abstract Background Re-irradiation (re-RT) of the thorax is challenging due to the impact of prior therapies on normal tissues, and there are few reports of definitive re-RT. The treatment toxicities and efficacy of re-RT are not well known. The aim of the present study was to assess the safety and efficacy of definitive re-RT of the thorax. Methods Patients who were treated with thoracic re-RT between March 2007 and December 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. Primary and re-irradiation plans were required to have an overlap of dose distributions for the 80 % isodose level. All doses were recalculated to an equivalent dose of 2 Gy per fraction (EQD2). When possible, analysis of dose accumulation was carried out using the medical image merge (MIM) (®) software program (version 6.5, MIM Software Inc., Cleveland, OH). Administration dosages for organs at risk were defined. Results Fourteen (67 %) and seven (33 %) patients with non-small cell carcinoma (NSCLC) and small cell carcinoma (SCLC), respectively, were identified. The patients' median age was 72 (range 53–85) years. Fifteen patients (71 %) had "proximal" tumors, defined as tumors at the distal 2 cm of the trachea, carina, and main bronchi. The median interval from initial RT to re-RT was 26.8 (range 11.4–92.3) months. Re-RT was delivered by X-ray beam and proton beam therapy in 20 (95 %) patients and 1 (5 %) patient, respectively. The median radiation dose of re-RT was 60 (range 54–87.5) Gy10 and 50 (range 50.0–87.5)Abstract Background Re-irradiation (re-RT) of the thorax is challenging due to the impact of prior therapies on normal tissues, and there are few reports of definitive re-RT. The treatment toxicities and efficacy of re-RT are not well known. The aim of the present study was to assess the safety and efficacy of definitive re-RT of the thorax. Methods Patients who were treated with thoracic re-RT between March 2007 and December 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. Primary and re-irradiation plans were required to have an overlap of dose distributions for the 80 % isodose level. All doses were recalculated to an equivalent dose of 2 Gy per fraction (EQD2). When possible, analysis of dose accumulation was carried out using the medical image merge (MIM) (®) software program (version 6.5, MIM Software Inc., Cleveland, OH). Administration dosages for organs at risk were defined. Results Fourteen (67 %) and seven (33 %) patients with non-small cell carcinoma (NSCLC) and small cell carcinoma (SCLC), respectively, were identified. The patients' median age was 72 (range 53–85) years. Fifteen patients (71 %) had "proximal" tumors, defined as tumors at the distal 2 cm of the trachea, carina, and main bronchi. The median interval from initial RT to re-RT was 26.8 (range 11.4–92.3) months. Re-RT was delivered by X-ray beam and proton beam therapy in 20 (95 %) patients and 1 (5 %) patient, respectively. The median radiation dose of re-RT was 60 (range 54–87.5) Gy10 and 50 (range 50.0–87.5) Gy10 for patients with NSCLC and SCLC, respectively. Grade 3 acute radiation pneumonitis occurred in only one patient. There were no other serious complications. The median follow-up time was 22.1 (range 2.3–56.4) months. The median local progression-free survival time (LPFS) and overall survival time (OS) were 12.9 (95 % confidence interval (CI): 8.9–27.9) months and 31.4 (95 % CI: 16.9–45.9) months, respectively. Patients receiving ≥ 60 Gy10 at re-RT had longer LPFS (p = 0.04). Conclusions Good safety with longer OS than in previous reports was demonstrated. Re-RT seems to be a promising treatment option. Further study to define the risk-benefit ratios is necessary. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Radiation oncology. Volume 11:Issue 1(2016)
- Journal:
- Radiation oncology
- Issue:
- Volume 11:Issue 1(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 11, Issue 1 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 11
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0011-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 1
- Page End:
- 8
- Publication Date:
- 2016-12
- Subjects:
- Lung cancer -- Recurrence tumor -- Re-irradiation
Cancer -- Radiotherapy -- Periodicals
616.9940642 - Journal URLs:
- http://pubmedcentral.com/tocrender.fcgi?journal=402&action=archive ↗
http://www.ro-journal.com/ ↗
http://link.springer.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1186/s13014-016-0673-z ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1748-717X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 9919.xml