Naive Bayes classifiers for verbal autopsies: comparison to physician-based classification for 21, 000 child and adult deaths. Issue 1 (December 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Miasnikof, Pierre; Giannakeas, Vasily; Gomes, Mireille; Aleksandrowicz, Lukasz; Shestopaloff, Alexander; Alam, Dewan; Tollman, Stephen; Samarikhalaj, Akram; Jha, Prabhat
• Is Part Of: BMC medicine. Volume 13:Issue 1(2015)
• Page Start: 1
• Page End: 9
• Publication Date: 2015-12
• Subjects: Cause of death (COD) -- Computer-coded verbal autopsy (CCVA) -- InterVA -- Tariff -- Naive Bayes classifier -- Physician certified verbal autopsy (PCVA) -- Verbal autopsy (VA); Medicine -- Periodicals; 610.5
• DOI: 10.1186/s12916-015-0521-2
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1741-7015

Abstract

Abstract Background Verbal autopsies (VA) are increasingly used in low- and middle-income countries where most causes of death (COD) occur at home without medical attention, and home deaths differ substantially from hospital deaths. Hence, there is no plausible "standard" against which VAs for home deaths may be validated. Previous studies have shown contradictory performance of automated methods compared to physician-based classification of CODs. We sought to compare the performance of the classic naive Bayes classifier (NBC) versus existing automated classifiers, using physician-based classification as the reference. Methods We compared the performance of NBC, an open-source Tariff Method (OTM), and InterVA-4 on three datasets covering about 21, 000 child and adult deaths: the ongoing Million Death Study in India, and health and demographic surveillance sites in Agincourt, South Africa and Matlab, Bangladesh. We applied several training and testing splits of the data to quantify the sensitivity and specificity compared to physician coding for individual CODs and to test the cause-specific mortality fractions at the population level. Results The NBC achieved comparable sensitivity (median 0.51, range 0.48-0.58) to OTM (median 0.50, range 0.41-0.51), with InterVA-4 having lower sensitivity (median 0.43, range 0.36-0.47) in all three datasets, across all CODs. Consistency of CODs was comparable for NBC and InterVA-4 but lower for OTM. NBC and OTM achieved better performance when using a local rather than a non-local training dataset. At the population level, NBC scored the highest cause-specific mortality fraction accuracy across the datasets (median 0.88, range 0.87-0.93), followed by InterVA-4 (median 0.66, range 0.62-0.73) and OTM (median 0.57, range 0.42-0.58). Conclusions NBC outperforms current similar COD classifiers at the population level. Nevertheless, no current automated classifier adequately replicates physician classification for individual CODs. There is a need for further research on automated classifiers using local training and test data in diverse settings prior to recommending any replacement of physician-based classification of verbal autopsies.