Global and local emissions of a biogas plant considering the production of biomethane as an alternative end-use solution. (1st September 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ravina, Marco; Genon, Giuseppe
• Is Part Of: Journal of cleaner production. Volume 102(2015:Sep. 01)
• Page Start: 115
• Page End: 126
• Publication Date: 2015-09-01
• Subjects: Biofuel -- Biogas -- Biomethane -- Carbon footprint -- NOx -- Particulate matter; AwR alkaline with regeneration carbon mineralization -- BABIU bottom ash for biogas upgrading -- CH4 methane -- CHP combined heat and power -- CO2 carbon dioxide -- CO2eq equivalent carbon dioxide -- CRY cryogenic separation -- dLUC direct land use change -- GHG greenhouse gas -- GWP global warming potential -- H2S hydrogen sulfide -- iLUC indirect land use change -- LCA life cycle assessment -- LPG liquefied petroleum gases -- MB membrane permeation -- MEA chemical absorption with amine solutions -- NG natural gas -- NH3 ammonia -- NOx nitrogen oxides -- PM particulate matter -- PM2.5 particulate matter ≤2.5 μm -- PM10 particulate matter ≤10 μm -- PSA pressure swing absorption -- PWS pressurized water scrubbing -- SCR selective catalytic removal -- SO2 sulfur dioxide -- VOC volatile organic compounds -- VS volatile solids -- λ excess air-to-fuel ratio; Factory and trade waste -- Management -- Periodicals; Manufactures -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals; Déchets industriels -- Gestion -- Périodiques; Usines -- Aspect de l'environnement -- Périodiques; 628.5
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.056
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0959-6526

Abstract

Abstract: The conversion of biomass to energy is a complex process whose environmental sustainability must be assessed. In the present work, global and local emissions of a biogas plant are evaluated considering two alternative end uses: combustion of biogas in a combined heat and power unit or upgrading of biogas to biomethane and subsequent injection to the gas grid or use in transports. Global emissions are estimated by using the carbon footprint methodology, comparing the scenarios on the basis of the same functional unit. The results show a CO2 reduction for biogas combustion equivalent to that of biomethane used as fuel in transports. If the thermal energy produced by the biogas cogenerator is not used, the greenhouse gas balance approaches to zero. A second part of the work considers the contribution of methane losses from the upgrading process. The equivalent CO2 saving raises considerably if methane slip is limited to 0.05%, while the process results no longer sustainable for a methane loss of 4%. The evaluation of local impacts considers the emission of NOx and particulate matter (PM) generated by biogas combustion and its alternative solution. A Gaussian model of dispersion is applied and ground level iso-concentration maps are generated. The results show a variable extension of the plume which may a cause non-negligible impact of these pollutants in the surroundings of the source. Adopting biomethane as the end use solution could partly or totally avoid these local impacts. In conclusion, this work points out that adopting the biomethane solution may result environmentally sustainable in terms of greenhouse gas emissions and reduction of NOx and PM local emission. Highlights: Emissions of biogas combustion and biomethane production are calculated and compared. Biomethane shows equivalent CO2 balance to biogas cogeneration without waste of heat. CH4 losses from the biogas upgrading process show great influence on the CO2 balance. NOx and soot emissions from the engine are represented through iso-concentration maps. Considerations are made on how biomethane solution would change local emissions.