Building a multi-scaled geospatial temporal ecology database from disparate data sources: fostering open science and data reuse. Issue 1 (December 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Building a multi-scaled geospatial temporal ecology database from disparate data sources: fostering open science and data reuse. Issue 1 (December 2015)
- Main Title:
- Building a multi-scaled geospatial temporal ecology database from disparate data sources: fostering open science and data reuse
- Authors:
- Soranno, Patricia
Bissell, Edward
Cheruvelil, Kendra
Christel, Samuel
Collins, Sarah
Fergus, C.
Filstrup, Christopher
Lapierre, Jean-Francois
Lottig, Noah
Oliver, Samantha
Scott, Caren
Smith, Nicole
Stopyak, Scott
Yuan, Shuai
Bremigan, Mary
Downing, John
Gries, Corinna
Henry, Emily
Skaff, Nick
Stanley, Emily
Stow, Craig
Tan, Pang-Ning
Wagner, Tyler
Webster, Katherine - Abstract:
- Abstract Although there are considerable site-based data for individual or groups of ecosystems, these datasets are widely scattered, have different data formats and conventions, and often have limited accessibility. At the broader scale, national datasets exist for a large number of geospatial features of land, water, and air that are needed to fully understand variation among these ecosystems. However, such datasets originate from different sources and have different spatial and temporal resolutions. By taking an open-science perspective and by combining site-based ecosystem datasets and national geospatial datasets, science gains the ability to ask important research questions related to grand environmental challenges that operate at broad scales. Documentation of such complicated database integration efforts, through peer-reviewed papers, is recommended to foster reproducibility and future use of the integrated database. Here, we describe the major steps, challenges, and considerations in building an integrated database of lake ecosystems, called LAGOS (LAke multi-scaled GeOSpatial and temporal database), that was developed at the sub-continental study extent of 17 US states (1, 800, 000 km2 ). LAGOS includes two modules: LAGOSGEO, with geospatial data on every lake with surface area larger than 4 ha in the study extent (~50, 000 lakes), including climate, atmospheric deposition, land use/cover, hydrology, geology, and topography measured across a range of spatial andAbstract Although there are considerable site-based data for individual or groups of ecosystems, these datasets are widely scattered, have different data formats and conventions, and often have limited accessibility. At the broader scale, national datasets exist for a large number of geospatial features of land, water, and air that are needed to fully understand variation among these ecosystems. However, such datasets originate from different sources and have different spatial and temporal resolutions. By taking an open-science perspective and by combining site-based ecosystem datasets and national geospatial datasets, science gains the ability to ask important research questions related to grand environmental challenges that operate at broad scales. Documentation of such complicated database integration efforts, through peer-reviewed papers, is recommended to foster reproducibility and future use of the integrated database. Here, we describe the major steps, challenges, and considerations in building an integrated database of lake ecosystems, called LAGOS (LAke multi-scaled GeOSpatial and temporal database), that was developed at the sub-continental study extent of 17 US states (1, 800, 000 km2 ). LAGOS includes two modules: LAGOSGEO, with geospatial data on every lake with surface area larger than 4 ha in the study extent (~50, 000 lakes), including climate, atmospheric deposition, land use/cover, hydrology, geology, and topography measured across a range of spatial and temporal extents; and LAGOSLIMNO, with lake water quality data compiled from ~100 individual datasets for a subset of lakes in the study extent (~10, 000 lakes). Procedures for the integration of datasets included: creating a flexible database design; authoring and integrating metadata; documenting data provenance; quantifying spatial measures of geographic data; quality-controlling integrated and derived data; and extensively documenting the database. Our procedures make a large, complex, and integrated database reproducible and extensible, allowing users to ask new research questions with the existing database or through the addition of new data. The largest challenge of this task was the heterogeneity of the data, formats, and metadata. Many steps of data integration need manual input from experts in diverse fields, requiring close collaboration. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- GigaScience. Volume 4:Issue 1(2015)
- Journal:
- GigaScience
- Issue:
- Volume 4:Issue 1(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 4, Issue 1 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 4
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0004-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 1
- Page End:
- 15
- Publication Date:
- 2015-12
- Subjects:
- LAGOS -- Integrated database -- Data harmonization -- Database documentation -- Data reuse -- Data sharing -- Ecoinformatics -- Macrosystems ecology -- Landscape limnology -- Water quality
Information storage and retrieval systems -- Research -- Periodicals
Biology -- Research -- Periodicals
Medical sciences -- Research -- Periodicals
Database management -- Periodicals
570.285 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.gigasciencejournal.com/ ↗
http://www.oxfordjournals.org/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1186/s13742-015-0067-4 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2047-217X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 9917.xml