Exosome-like vesicles in uterine aspirates: a comparison of ultracentrifugation-based isolation protocols. Issue 1 (December 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Campoy, Irene; Lanau, Lucia; Altadill, Tatiana; Sequeiros, Tamara; Cabrera, Silvia; Cubo-Abert, Montserrat; Pérez-Benavente, Assumpción; Garcia, Angel; Borrós, Salvador; Santamaria, Anna; Ponce, Jordi; Matias-Guiu, Xavier; Reventós, Jaume; Gil-Moreno, Antonio; Rigau, Marina; Colas, Eva
• Is Part Of: Journal of translational medicine. Volume 14:Issue 1(2016)
• Page Start: 1
• Page End: 12
• Publication Date: 2016-12
• Subjects: Biomarker -- Endometrial biopsy -- Exosomes -- Exosomes isolation protocols -- Exosome-like vesicles -- Extracellular vesicles -- Gynecological disorders -- Microvesicles -- RNA -- Uterine aspirates; Medicine, Experimental -- Periodicals; Human experimentation in medicine -- Periodicals; Therapeutics -- Periodicals; 615.50724
• DOI: 10.1186/s12967-016-0935-4
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1479-5876

Abstract

Abstract Background Uterine aspirates are used in the diagnostic process of endometrial disorders, yet further applications could emerge if its complex milieu was simplified. Exosome-like vesicles isolated from uterine aspirates could become an attractive source of biomarkers, but there is a need to standardize isolation protocols. The objective of the study was to determine whether exosome-like vesicles exist in the fluid fraction of uterine aspirates and to compare protocols for their isolation, characterization, and analysis. Methods We collected uterine aspirates from 39 pre-menopausal women suffering from benign gynecological diseases. The fluid fraction of 27 of those aspirates were pooled and split into equal volumes to evaluate three differential centrifugation-based procedures: (1) a standard protocol, (2) a filtration protocol, and (3) a sucrose cushion protocol. Characterization of isolated vesicles was assessed by electron microscopy, nanoparticle tracking analysis and immunoblot. Specifically for RNA material, we evaluate the effect of sonication and RNase A treatment at different steps of the protocol. We finally confirmed the efficiency of the selected methods in non-pooled samples. Results All protocols were useful to isolate exosome-like vesicles. However, the Standard procedure was the best performing protocol to isolate exosome-like vesicles from uterine aspirates: nanoparticle tracking analysis revealed a higher concentration of vesicles with a mode of 135 ± 5 nm, and immunoblot showed a higher expression of exosome-related markers (CD9, CD63, and CD81) thus verifying an enrichment in this type of vesicles. RNA contained in exosome-like vesicles was successfully extracted with no sonication treatment and exogenous nucleic acids digestion with RNaseA, allowing the analysis of the specific inner cargo by Real-Time qPCR. Conclusion We confirmed the existence of exosome-like vesicles in the fluid fraction of uterine aspirates. They were successfully isolated by differential centrifugation giving sufficient proteomic and transcriptomic material for further analyses. The Standard protocol was the best performing procedure since the other two tested protocols did not ameliorate neither yield nor purity of exosome-like vesicles. This study contributes to establishing the basis for future comparative studies to foster the field of biomarker research in gynecology.