Distribution of malaria exposure in endemic countries in Africa considering country levels of effective treatment. (December 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Penny, Melissa; Maire, Nicolas; Bever, Caitlin; Pemberton-Ross, Peter; Briët, Olivier; Smith, David; Gething, Peter; Smith, Thomas
• Is Part Of: Malaria journal. Volume 14:Number 1(2015)
• Page Start: 1
• Page End: 16
• Publication Date: 2015-12
• Subjects: Malaria -- Transmission -- Case-management -- Simulation -- Dynamic model; Malaria -- Periodicals; 616.9362
• DOI: 10.1186/s12936-015-0864-3
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1475-2875

Abstract

Abstract Background Malaria prevalence, clinical incidence, treatment, and transmission rates are dynamically interrelated. Prevalence is often considered a measure of malaria transmission, but treatment of clinical malaria reduces prevalence, and consequently also infectiousness to the mosquito vector and onward transmission. The impact of the frequency of treatment on prevalence in a population is generally not considered. This can lead to potential underestimation of malaria exposure in settings with good health systems. Furthermore, these dynamical relationships between prevalence, treatment, and transmission have not generally been taken into account in estimates of burden. Methods Using prevalence as an input, estimates of disease incidence and transmission [as the distribution of the entomological inoculation rate (EIR)] forPlasmodium falciparum have now been made for 43 countries in Africa using both empirical relationships (that do not allow for treatment) and OpenMalaria dynamic micro-simulation models (that explicitly include the effects of treatment). For each estimate, prevalence inputs were taken from geo-statistical models fitted for the year 2010 by the Malaria Atlas Project to all available observed prevalence data. National level estimates of the effectiveness of case management in treating clinical attacks were used as inputs to the estimation of both EIR and disease incidence by the dynamic models. Results and conclusions When coverage of effective treatment is taken into account, higher country level estimates of average EIR and thus higher disease burden, are obtained for a given prevalence level, especially where access to treatment is high, and prevalence relatively low. These methods provide a unified framework for comparison of both the immediate and longer-term impacts of case management and of preventive interventions.