Educational impact of a clinical anatomy workshop on 1st-year orthopedic and rheumatology fellows in Mexico City. Issue 5 (May 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Saavedra, M.; Villaseñor-Ovies, P.; Harfush, L.; Navarro-Zarza, J.; Canoso, J.; Cruz-Domínguez, P.; Vargas, A.; Hernández-Díaz, C.; Chiapas-Gasca, K.; Camacho-Galindo, J.; Alvarez-Nemegyei, J.; Kalish, R.
• Is Part Of: Clinical rheumatology. Volume 35:Issue 5(2016)
• Page Start: 1299
• Page End: 1306
• Publication Date: 2016-05
• Subjects: Clinical anatomy knowledge -- Education -- Orthopedic fellows training -- Rheumatology fellows training; Rheumatology -- Periodicals; 616.723
• DOI: 10.1007/s10067-015-3076-x
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0770-3198

Abstract

Abstract We aim to study the educational impact of a clinical anatomy workshop in 1st-year orthopedic and rheumatology fellows. First-year rheumatology fellows (N = 17) and a convenience sample of 1st-year orthopedic fellows (N = 14) from Mexico City in the 9th month of training participated in the study. The pre- and the post- workshop tests included the same 20 questions that had to be answered by identification or demonstration of relevant anatomical items. The questions, arranged by anatomical regions, were asked in five dynamic stations. Overall, the 31 participants showed an increase of correct answers, from a median of 6 (range 1 to 12) in the pre-workshop test, to a median of 14 (range 7 to 19) in the post-workshop test. In the pre-workshop test, the correct median answers were 7 (range 2 to 12) in the orthopedic fellows and 5 (range 1 to 10) in the rheumatology fellows (p = 0.297). Corresponding scores in the post-workshop were 15 (range 10 to 19) and 12 (range 7 to 18) (p = 0.026) showing a significant difference favoring the orthopedic group. Our clinical anatomy workshop was efficacious, in the short term, as a teaching instrument for 1st-year orthopedic and rheumatology fellows. The post-workshop scores, although significantly improved in both groups, particularly in the orthopedic fellows, were still suboptimal. Further refinements of our workshop might yield better results.