Who's misbehaving? Perceptions of unprofessional social media use by medical students and faculty. Issue 1 (December 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Who's misbehaving? Perceptions of unprofessional social media use by medical students and faculty. Issue 1 (December 2016)
- Main Title:
- Who's misbehaving? Perceptions of unprofessional social media use by medical students and faculty
- Authors:
- Kitsis, Elizabeth
Milan, Felise
Cohen, Hillel
Myers, Daniel
Herron, Patrick
McEvoy, Mimi
Weingarten, Jacqueline
Grayson, Martha - Abstract:
- Abstract Background Social media use by physicians offers potential benefits but may also be associated with professionalism problems. The objectives of this study were: 1) to examine and compare characteristics of social media use by medical students and faculty; 2) to explore the scope of self- and peer-posting of unprofessional online content; and 3) to determine what actions were taken when unprofessional content was viewed. Methods An anonymous, web-based survey was sent to medical students and faculty in October, 2013 at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine in Bronx, New York. Results Three-quarters of medical students reported using social media "very frequently" (several times a day), whereas less than one-third of faculty did so (p < .001). Medical students reported using privacy settings more often than faculty (96.5 % v. 78.1 %, p < .001). Most medical students (94.2 %) and faculty (94.1 %) reported "never" or "occasionally" monitoring their online presence (p = 0.94). Medical students reportedself -posting of profanity, depiction of intoxication, and sexually suggestive material more often than faculty (p < .001). Medical students and faculty both reportedpeer -posting of unprofessional content significantly more often thanself- posting. There was no association between year of medical school and posting of unprofessional content. Conclusion Medical students reported spending more time using social media and posting unprofessional content more often thanAbstract Background Social media use by physicians offers potential benefits but may also be associated with professionalism problems. The objectives of this study were: 1) to examine and compare characteristics of social media use by medical students and faculty; 2) to explore the scope of self- and peer-posting of unprofessional online content; and 3) to determine what actions were taken when unprofessional content was viewed. Methods An anonymous, web-based survey was sent to medical students and faculty in October, 2013 at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine in Bronx, New York. Results Three-quarters of medical students reported using social media "very frequently" (several times a day), whereas less than one-third of faculty did so (p < .001). Medical students reported using privacy settings more often than faculty (96.5 % v. 78.1 %, p < .001). Most medical students (94.2 %) and faculty (94.1 %) reported "never" or "occasionally" monitoring their online presence (p = 0.94). Medical students reportedself -posting of profanity, depiction of intoxication, and sexually suggestive material more often than faculty (p < .001). Medical students and faculty both reportedpeer -posting of unprofessional content significantly more often thanself- posting. There was no association between year of medical school and posting of unprofessional content. Conclusion Medical students reported spending more time using social media and posting unprofessional content more often than did faculty. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- BMC medical education. Volume 16:Issue 1(2016)
- Journal:
- BMC medical education
- Issue:
- Volume 16:Issue 1(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 16, Issue 1 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 16
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0016-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 1
- Page End:
- 7
- Publication Date:
- 2016-12
- Subjects:
- Medical education -- Periodicals
610.715 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcmededuc/ ↗
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/tocrender.fcgi?journal=38 ↗
http://link.springer.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1186/s12909-016-0572-x ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1472-6920
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 9906.xml