Are temporal patterns of sitting associated with obesity among blue-collar workers? A cross sectional study using accelerometers. (December 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Gupta, Nidhi; Hallman, David; Mathiassen, Svend; Aadahl, Mette; Jørgensen, Marie; Holtermann, Andreas
• Is Part Of: BMC public health. Volume 16:Number 1(2016)
• Page Start: 1
• Page End: 10
• Publication Date: 2016-12
• Subjects: Brief sitting bouts, prolonged sitting bouts -- Total sitting time -- Sedentary behavior -- Prolong sitting -- Interrupted sitting -- Working day -- Physical activity; Public health -- Periodicals; 362.105
• DOI: 10.1186/s12889-016-2803-9
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1471-2458

Abstract

Abstract Background Little is known about associations oftemporal patterns of sitting (i.e., distribution of sitting across time) with obesity. We aimed investigating the association between temporal patterns of sitting (long, moderate and brief uninterrupted bouts) and obesity indicators (body mass index (BMI), waist circumference and fat percentage), independently from moderate-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and total sitting time among blue-collar workers. Methods Workers (n = 205) wore Actigraph GT3X+ accelerometers on the thigh and trunk for 1–4 working days. Using the validated Acti4 software, the total sitting time and time spent sitting inbrief (≤5 mins), moderate (>5 and ≤30 mins), andlong (>30mins) bouts on working days were determined for the whole day, and for leisure and work separately. BMI (kg/m2 ), waist circumference (cm) and fat percentage were objectively measured. Results Results of linear regression analysis adjusted for multiple confounders indicated that brief bouts of sitting was negatively associated with obesity for the whole day (BMI, P < 0.01; fat percentage, P < 0.01; waist circumference, P < 0.01) and work (BMI, P < 0.01; fat percentage, P < 0.01; waist circumference, P < 0.01), but not for leisure. Sitting time in long bouts was positively associated with obesity indicators for the whole day (waist circumference, P = 0.05) and work (waist circumference, P = 0.01; BMI, P = 0.04), but not leisure. Conclusions For the whole day as well as for work, brief bouts and long bouts of sitting showed opposite associations with obesity even after adjusting for MVPA and total sitting time, while sitting during leisure did not show these associations. Thus, the temporal distribution of sitting seems to influence the relationship between sitting and obesity.