Assessment of DNA methylation profiling and copy number variation as indications of clonal relationship in ipsilateral and contralateral breast cancers to distinguish recurrent breast cancer from a second primary tumour. Issue 1 (December 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Huang, Katie; Mikeska, Thomas; Li, Jason; Takano, Elena; Millar, Ewan; Graham, Peter; Boyle, Samantha; Campbell, Ian; Speed, Terence; Dobrovic, Alexander; Fox, Stephen
• Is Part Of: BMC cancer. Volume 15:Issue 1(2015)
• Page Start: 1
• Page End: 11
• Publication Date: 2015-12
• Subjects: DNA methylation -- Comparative genomic hybridisation -- Ipsilateral -- Contralateral -- Breast; Cancer -- Periodicals; 616.994005
• DOI: 10.1186/s12885-015-1676-0
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1471-2407

Abstract

Abstract Background Patients with breast cancer have an increased risk of developing subsequent breast cancers. It is important to distinguish whether these tumours arede novo or recurrences of the primary tumour in order to guide the appropriate therapy. Our aim was to investigate the use of DNA methylation profiling and array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) to determine whether the second tumour is clonally related to the first tumour. Methods Methylation-sensitive high-resolution melting was used to screen promoter methylation in a panel of 13 genes reported as methylated in breast cancer (RASSF1A, TWIST1, APC, WIF1, MGMT, MAL, CDH13, RARβ, BRCA1, CDH1, CDKN2A, TP73, andGSTP1 ) in 29 tumour pairs (16 ipsilateral and 13 contralateral). Using the methylation profile of these genes, we employed a Bayesian and an empirical statistical approach to estimate clonal relationship. Copy number alterations were analysed using aCGH on the same set of tumour pairs. Results There is a higher probability of the second tumour being recurrent in ipsilateral tumours compared with contralateral tumours (38 % versus 8 %;p <0.05) based on the methylation profile. Using previously reported recurrence rates as Bayesian prior probabilities, we classified 69 % of ipsilateral and 15 % of contralateral tumours as recurrent. The inferred clonal relationship results of the tumour pairs were generally concordant between methylation profiling and aCGH. Conclusion Our results show that DNA methylation profiling as well as aCGH have potential as diagnostic tools in improving the clinical decisions to differentiate recurrences from a secondde novo tumour.