A Birth-cohort testing intervention identified hepatitis c virus infection among patients with few identified risks: a cross-sectional study. Issue 1 (December 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A Birth-cohort testing intervention identified hepatitis c virus infection among patients with few identified risks: a cross-sectional study. Issue 1 (December 2015)
- Main Title:
- A Birth-cohort testing intervention identified hepatitis c virus infection among patients with few identified risks: a cross-sectional study
- Authors:
- Southern, William
Norton, Brianna
Steinman, Meredith
DeLuca, Joseph
Drainoni, Mari-Lynn
Smith, Bryce
Litwin, Alain - Abstract:
- Abstract Background International guidelines and U.S. guidelines prior to 2012 only recommended testing for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection among patients at risk, but adherence to guidelines is poor, and the majority of those infected remain undiagnosed. A strategy to perform one-time testing of all patients born during 1945–1965, birth cohort testing, may diagnose HCV infection among patients whose risk remains unknown. We sought to determine if a birth-cohort testing intervention for HCV antibody positivity helped identify patients with fewer documented risk factors or medical indications than a pre-intervention, risk-based testing strategy. Methods We used a cross-sectional design with retrospective electronic medical record review to examine patients identified with HCV antibody positivity (Ab+) during a pre-intervention (risk-based) phase, the standard of care at the time, vs. a birth-cohort testing intervention phase. We compared demographic and clinical characteristics and HCV risk-associated factors among patients whose HCV Ab + was identified during the pre-intervention (risk-based testing) vs. post birth-cohort intervention phases. Study subjects were patients identified as HCV-Ab + in the baseline (risk-based) and birth-cohort testing phases of the Hepatitis C Assessment and Testing (HepCAT) Project. Results Compared to the risk-based phase, patients newly diagnosed with HCV Ab + after the birth-cohort intervention were significantly less likely to have aAbstract Background International guidelines and U.S. guidelines prior to 2012 only recommended testing for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection among patients at risk, but adherence to guidelines is poor, and the majority of those infected remain undiagnosed. A strategy to perform one-time testing of all patients born during 1945–1965, birth cohort testing, may diagnose HCV infection among patients whose risk remains unknown. We sought to determine if a birth-cohort testing intervention for HCV antibody positivity helped identify patients with fewer documented risk factors or medical indications than a pre-intervention, risk-based testing strategy. Methods We used a cross-sectional design with retrospective electronic medical record review to examine patients identified with HCV antibody positivity (Ab+) during a pre-intervention (risk-based) phase, the standard of care at the time, vs. a birth-cohort testing intervention phase. We compared demographic and clinical characteristics and HCV risk-associated factors among patients whose HCV Ab + was identified during the pre-intervention (risk-based testing) vs. post birth-cohort intervention phases. Study subjects were patients identified as HCV-Ab + in the baseline (risk-based) and birth-cohort testing phases of the Hepatitis C Assessment and Testing (HepCAT) Project. Results Compared to the risk-based phase, patients newly diagnosed with HCV Ab + after the birth-cohort intervention were significantly less likely to have a history of any substance abuse (30.5 % vs. 49.5 %, p = 0.02), elevated alanine transaminase levels of > 40 U/L (22.0 % vs. 46.7 %, p = 0.002), or the compositeany risk-associated factor (55.9 % vs. 79.0 %, p = 0.002). Conclusions Birth-cohort testing is an useful strategy for identifying previously undiagnosed HCV Ab + because it does not require providers ask risk-based questions, or patients to disclose risk behaviors, and appears to identify HCVAb + in patients who would not have been identified using a risk-based testing strategy. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- BMC infectious diseases. Volume 15:Issue 1(2015)
- Journal:
- BMC infectious diseases
- Issue:
- Volume 15:Issue 1(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 15, Issue 1 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 15
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0015-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 1
- Page End:
- 7
- Publication Date:
- 2015-12
- Subjects:
- Hepatitis C virus -- Screening -- Testing strategies -- Risk assessment
Communicable diseases -- Periodicals
Sexually Transmitted Diseases -- Periodicals
616.905 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcinfectdis/ ↗
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/tocrender.fcgi?journal=36 ↗
http://link.springer.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1186/s12879-015-1283-3 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1471-2334
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 9883.xml