Developing a kinematic understanding of chest compressions: the impact of depth and release time on blood flow during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Issue 1 (December 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lampe, Joshua; Tai, Yin; Bratinov, George; Weiland, Theodore; Kaufman, Christopher; Berg, Robert; Becker, Lance
• Is Part Of: Biomedical engineering online. Volume 14:Issue 1(2015)
• Page Start: 1
• Page End: 16
• Publication Date: 2015-12
• Subjects: Resuscitation -- Cardiopulmonary resuscitation -- Chest compressions -- Blood flow; Biomedical engineering -- Periodicals; 610.2805
• DOI: 10.1186/s12938-015-0095-4
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1475-925X

Abstract

Abstract Background Effective cardiopulmonary resuscitation is a critical component of the pre-hospital treatment of cardiac arrest victims. Mechanical chest compression (MCC) devices enable the delivery of MCC waveforms that could not be delivered effectively by hand. While chest compression generated blood flow has been studied for more than 50 years, the relation between sternum kinematics (depth over time) and the resulting blood flow have not been well described. Using a five parameter MCC model, we studied the effect of MCC depth, MCC release time, and their interaction on MCC generated blood flow in a highly instrumented swine model of cardiac arrest. Methods MCC hemodynamics were studied in 17 domestic swine (~30 kg) using multiple extra-vascular flow probes and standard physiological monitoring. After 10 min of untreated ventricular fibrillation, mechanical MCC were started. MCC varied such that sternal release occurred over 100, 200, or 300 ms. MCC were delivered at a rate of 100 per min and at a depth of 1.25″ (n = 9) or at a depth of 1.9″ (n = 8) for a total of 18 min. Transitions between release times occurred every 2 min and were randomized. Linear Mixed Models were used to estimate the effect of MCC depth, MCC release time, and the interaction between MCC depth and release time on physiological outcomes. Results Blood pressures were optimized by a 200 ms release. End tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2 ) was optimized by a 100 ms release. Blood flows were significantly lower at a 300 ms release than at either a 100 or 200 ms release (p < 0.05). 1.9″ deep MCC improved EtCO2, right atrial pressure, coronary perfusion pressure, inferior vena cava blood flow, carotid blood flow, and renal vein blood flow relative to 1.25″ MCC. Conclusions Deeper MCC improved several hemodynamic parameters. Chest compressions with a 300 ms release time generated less blood flow than chest compressions with faster release times. MCC release time is an important quantitative metric of MCC quality and, if optimized, could improve MCC generated blood flows and pressures.