A culture shock in dental hygiene: Exploring the management of oral health after head and neck cancer. Issue 2 (25th December 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Pateman, Kelsey A.; Weerakoon, Arosha T.; Batstone, Martin D.; Ford, Pauline J.
• Is Part Of: International journal of dental hygiene. Volume 17:Issue 2(2019:May)
• Page Start: 183
• Page End: 191
• Publication Date: 2018-12-25
• Subjects: access to care -- community dentistry -- dental hygiene -- head and neck cancer -- mouth neoplasm -- oncology -- oral hygiene -- supportive oral care; Dental hygiene -- Periodicals; Dental hygienists -- Periodicals; 617.60105
• DOI: 10.1111/idh.12376
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1601-5029

Abstract

Abstract: Objectives: Managing oral health after the treatment for head and neck cancer requires meticulous daily oral hygiene practices and regular professional dental care; however, the individual factors and health system structures required to achieve oral health are often not well considered. This study aimed to explore how oral health was understood and managed after head and neck cancer treatment and identify factors that influenced oral health behaviours and dental service utilization. Methods: A qualitative, inductive approach was used for data collection and analysis. Sampling of participants was purposive, using a maximum variation approach, and data were analysed using thematic analysis. Participants were recruited from the maxillofacial clinic at a tertiary facility in Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. Results: Twenty‐one participants took part in the study. Findings described individual and structural factors that influenced the management of oral health post‐treatment. Individual determinants of oral health behaviours included a cognitive shift towards lifelong oral health; management of unexpected barriers; and management of competing priorities. Structural factors included availability, accessibility of services, and continuity of care. The ability to fund oral health emerged as a salient theme that influenced both individual and structural factors. Conclusions: Strong self‐efficacy and financial and spousal support enhanced the management of oral health, whereas difficulty managing competing issues post‐treatment, such as psychological and financial stress, limited participants' capacity to prioritize and manage oral health. Policy initiatives are needed to address the structural barriers caused by a lack of timely access to general and preventive dental care post‐treatment.