Light-induced gene expression with photocaged IPTG for induction profiling in a high-throughput screening system. Issue 1 (December 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wandrey, Georg; Bier, Claus; Binder, Dennis; Hoffmann, Kyra; Jaeger, Karl-Erich; Pietruszka, Jörg; Drepper, Thomas; Büchs, Jochen
• Is Part Of: Microbial cell factories. Volume 15:Issue 1(2016)
• Page Start: 1
• Page End: 16
• Publication Date: 2016-12
• Subjects: Caged compounds -- Photocaged IPTG -- LED array -- Optical induction -- Automatization -- High-throughput screening -- Recombinant protein expression -- Escherichia coli -- FbFP -- Induction profiling -- BioLector -- Shaken microtiter plate; Microbial biotechnology -- Periodicals; Recombinant proteins -- Synthesis -- Periodicals; 660.62
• DOI: 10.1186/s12934-016-0461-3
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1475-2859

Abstract

Abstract Background Inducible expression systems are frequently used for the production of heterologous proteins. Achieving maximum product concentrations requires induction profiling, namely the optimization of induction time and inducer concentration. However, the respective experiments can be very laborious and time-consuming. In this work, a new approach for induction profiling is presented where induction in a microtiter plate based cultivation system (BioLector) is achieved by light using photocaged isopropylβ -d -1-thiogalactopyranoside (cIPTG). Results A flavin mononucleotide-based fluorescent reporter protein (FbFP) was expressed using a T7-RNA-polymerase dependentE. coli expression system which required IPTG as inducer. High power UV-A irradiation was directed into a microtiter plate by light-emitting diodes placed above each well of a 48-well plate. Upon UV irradiation, IPTG is released (uncaged) and induces product formation. IPTG uncaging, formation of the fluorescent reporter protein and biomass growth were monitored simultaneously in up to four 48-well microtiter plates in parallel with an in-house constructed BioLector screening system. The amount of released IPTG can be gradually and individually controlled for each well by duration of UV-A exposure, irradiance and concentration of photocaged IPTG added at the start of the cultivation. A comparison of experiments with either optical or conventional IPTG induction shows that product formation and growth are equivalent. Detailed induction profiles revealed that for the strain and conditions used maximum product formation is reached for very early induction times and with just 6–8 s of UV-A irradiation or 60–80 µM IPTG. Conclusions Optical induction and online monitoring were successfully combined in a high-throughput screening system and the effect of optical induction with photocaged IPTG was shown to be equivalent to conventional induction with IPTG. In contrast to conventional induction, optical induction is less costly to parallelize, easy to automate, non-invasive and without risk of contamination. Therefore, light-induced gene expression with photocaged IPTG is a highly advantageous method for the efficient optimization of heterologous protein production and has the potential to replace conventional induction with IPTG.