A three‐step conceptual roadmap for avoiding bile duct injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an invited perspective review. (7th April 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A three‐step conceptual roadmap for avoiding bile duct injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an invited perspective review. (7th April 2019)
- Main Title:
- A three‐step conceptual roadmap for avoiding bile duct injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an invited perspective review
- Authors:
- Strasberg, Steven M.
- Abstract:
- Abstract: Bile duct injuries are the most common serious complication of cholecystectomy. Avoidance of bile duct injury is a key aim of biliary surgery. The purpose of this paper is to describe laparoscopic cholecystectomy from the viewpoint of three conceptual goals. Three conceptual goals of cholecystectomy are: (1) getting secure anatomical identification of key structures; (2) making the right decision not to perform a total cholecystectomy when conditions are too dangerous to get secure identification – the "inflection point"; and (3) finishing the operation safely when secure anatomical identification of cystic structures is not possible. The Critical View of Safety (CVS) has been shown to be a good way of getting secure anatomical identification. Conceptually, CVS is a method of target identification, the targets being the two cystic structures. Sometimes, anatomic identification is not possible because the risk of biliary injury is judged to be too great. Then a decision is made to abandon the attempt to do a complete cholecystectomy – and instead to "bail‐out". This "inflection point" is defined as the moment at which the decision is made to halt the attempt to perform a total cholecystectomy laparoscopically and to finish the operation by a different method. Currently the best bail‐out procedure seems to be subtotal fenestrating cholecystectomy. Application of conceptual goals of cholecystectomy can help the surgeon to avoid biliary injury. Abstract : HighlightAbstract: Bile duct injuries are the most common serious complication of cholecystectomy. Avoidance of bile duct injury is a key aim of biliary surgery. The purpose of this paper is to describe laparoscopic cholecystectomy from the viewpoint of three conceptual goals. Three conceptual goals of cholecystectomy are: (1) getting secure anatomical identification of key structures; (2) making the right decision not to perform a total cholecystectomy when conditions are too dangerous to get secure identification – the "inflection point"; and (3) finishing the operation safely when secure anatomical identification of cystic structures is not possible. The Critical View of Safety (CVS) has been shown to be a good way of getting secure anatomical identification. Conceptually, CVS is a method of target identification, the targets being the two cystic structures. Sometimes, anatomic identification is not possible because the risk of biliary injury is judged to be too great. Then a decision is made to abandon the attempt to do a complete cholecystectomy – and instead to "bail‐out". This "inflection point" is defined as the moment at which the decision is made to halt the attempt to perform a total cholecystectomy laparoscopically and to finish the operation by a different method. Currently the best bail‐out procedure seems to be subtotal fenestrating cholecystectomy. Application of conceptual goals of cholecystectomy can help the surgeon to avoid biliary injury. Abstract : Highlight Strasberg describes the three conceptual goals of cholecystectomy: (1) obtaining secure anatomical identification of key structures, (2) making the decision not to perform total cholecystectomy when conditions are too dangerous to obtain secure identification – the "inflection point" and (3) finishing the operation safely when secure anatomical identification is not possible. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences. Volume 26:Number 4(2019)
- Journal:
- Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences
- Issue:
- Volume 26:Number 4(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 26, Issue 4 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 26
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0026-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- 123
- Page End:
- 127
- Publication Date:
- 2019-04-07
- Subjects:
- Acute cholecystitis -- Bile duct injury -- Biliary colic -- Biliary injury -- Cholecystectomy -- Critical view of safety -- Inflection point -- Laparoscopic cholecystectomy -- Subtotal cholecystectomy -- Subtotal fenestrating cholecystectomy -- Subtotal reconstituting cholecystectomy
Liver -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Biliary tract -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Pancreas -- Diseases -- Periodicals
617.556 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1868-6982 ↗
http://www.springerlink.com/content/121581 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/jhbp.616 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1868-6974
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4997.660000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 9821.xml