Morphological characterization of vegetation by real‐time three‐dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in infective endocarditis: Prognostic impact. Issue 4 (25th February 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Pérez‐García, Carlos Nicolás; Olmos, Carmen; Islas, Fabián; Marcos‐Alberca, Pedro; Pozo, Eduardo; Ferrera, Carlos; García‐Arribas, Daniel; Pérez de Isla, Leopoldo; Vilacosta, Isidre
• Is Part Of: Echocardiography. Volume 36:Issue 4(2019)
• Page Start: 742
• Page End: 751
• Publication Date: 2019-02-25
• Subjects: embolism -- endocarditis -- transesophageal echocardiography -- vegetation; Echocardiography -- Periodicals; Echocardiography -- Periodicals; 616.1207543
• DOI: 10.1111/echo.14293
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0742-2822

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: Vegetation size is a prognostic predictor in infective endocarditis (IE) and guides surgical management. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of real‐time 3‐dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (RT3DTEE) compared to 2DTEE in the diagnosis and characterization of vegetation, as well as its potential clinical impact. Methods: Two hundred and three consecutive patients with IE were recruited (2009–2016) and retrospectively analyzed. Vegetation diameters and area from 68 patients were measured by 2DTEE and RT3DTEE at admission. The association between size and systemic embolisms was evaluated with logistic regression models. Differences in the discriminative power for the best dimensions' cutoff points were assessed by comparing the area under the ROC curves (AUC). Results: Vegetation size and area were larger by RT3DTEE ( P < 0.001) than by 2DTEE, and RT3DTEE was especially relevant in the characterization of nonfiliform vegetation, Morphology was strongly associated with friability, being sessile vegetation less likely to embolize, compared to filiform and raceme‐shaped ones (15.4% vs 46% vs 50%). Major diameter by RT3DTEE had better embolic predictive performance than 2DTEE (AUC 0.76 [0.57–0.89] vs 0.71 [0.53–0.86]; P = 0.611). The best cutoff points associated with embolic events during the infection were 17 mm for RT3DTEE and 15 mm for 2DTEE. Based exclusively on vegetation size, the proportion of patients meeting a surgical indication according to current guidelines is higher using RT3DTEE. Conclusions: RT3DTEE allows a better characterization of IE vegetation than 2DTEE, what may have a clinical impact on surgical management and also prognostic due to a more accurate prediction of embolic risk.