Outcomes of patients with invasive fusariosis who undergo further immunosuppressive treatments, is there a role for secondary prophylaxis?. Issue 5 (10th April 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Outcomes of patients with invasive fusariosis who undergo further immunosuppressive treatments, is there a role for secondary prophylaxis?. Issue 5 (10th April 2019)
- Main Title:
- Outcomes of patients with invasive fusariosis who undergo further immunosuppressive treatments, is there a role for secondary prophylaxis?
- Authors:
- Nucci, Marcio
Shoham, Shmuel
Abdala, Edson
Hamerschlak, Nelson
Rico, Juan Carlos
Forghieri, Fabio
Nouér, Simone A.
Cappellano, Paola
Solza, Cristiana
Gonzaga, Yung
Nadali, Giampaolo
Nucci, Fabio
Colombo, Arnaldo L.
Albuquerque, Ana Munhoz
Queiroz‐Telles Filho, Flavio
Lima, Carlos B. L.
Arrais‐Rodrigues, Celso
Rocha, Vanderson
Marty, Francisco M. - Abstract:
- Summary: Background: Patients treated for invasive aspergillosis may relapse during subsequent periods of immunosuppression and should receive secondary prophylaxis. Little is known about the frequency of relapse and practices of secondary prophylaxis for invasive fusariosis (IF). Objectives: Evaluate practices of secondary prophylaxis and the frequency of relapse in patients who survived IF and were exposed to subsequent periods of immunosuppression. Methods: Multicentre retrospective study of patients with haematological malignancies who developed IF, survived the initial fungal disease period, and were exposed to subsequent periods of immunosuppression. Results: Among 40 patients, 35 received additional chemotherapy and developed neutropenia (median, 24 days; range, 4‐104), and five received glucocorticoids for the treatment of graft‐vs‐host disease. Overall, 32 patients received secondary prophylaxis (voriconazole in 24) for a median of 112 days (range, 12‐468). IF relapsed in five patients (12.5%): 2/8 (25%) not on prophylaxis and 3/32 (9.4%) receiving prophylaxis. Among 28 patients with disseminated IF, relapse occurred in 2/2 (100%) not on prophylaxis and in 3/26 (11.5%) on prophylaxis ( P = 0.03). All patients who relapsed IF died. Conclusions: Patients with IF who survive the initial disease may relapse if exposed to subsequent episodes of immunosuppressive therapies. Secondary prophylaxis should be considered, especially if IF was disseminated.
- Is Part Of:
- Mycoses. Volume 62:Issue 5(2019)
- Journal:
- Mycoses
- Issue:
- Volume 62:Issue 5(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 62, Issue 5 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 62
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0062-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- 413
- Page End:
- 417
- Publication Date:
- 2019-04-10
- Subjects:
- fusariosis -- Fusarium -- prophylaxis -- relapse -- secondary prophylaxis
Pathogenic fungi -- Periodicals
Medical mycology -- Periodicals
616.969 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1111/myc.12901 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0933-7407
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5995.753000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 9817.xml