Does neighborhood form influence low-carbon transportation in China?. (February 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Guan, ChengHe; Srinivasan, Sumeeta; Nielsen, Chris P.
• Is Part Of: Transportation research. Volume 67(2019)
• Page Start: 406
• Page End: 420
• Publication Date: 2019-02
• Subjects: Urban form -- Travel behavior -- Neighborhood -- Low-carbon transportation -- China; Transportation -- Research -- Periodicals; Transportation -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals; 354.76
• DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2018.12.015
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1361-9209

Abstract

Highlights: People choose LCT provided high population density and sufficient access to public transit. Land-use diversity alone was not found to be significant in affecting LCT mode choice. The proliferation of gated communities reduces connectivity and has a negative effect on LCT. Abstract: Developing less auto-dependent urban forms and promoting low-carbon transportation (LCT) are challenges facing our cities. Previous literature has supported the association between neighborhood form and low-carbon travel behaviour. Several studies have attempted to measure neighborhood forms focusing on physical built-environment factors such as population and employment density and socio-economic conditions such as income and race. We find that these characteristics may not be sufficiently fine-grained to differentiate between neighborhoods in Chinese cities. This research assesses characteristics of neighborhood spatial configuration that may influence the choice of LCT modes in the context of dense Chinese cities. Urban-form data from 40 neighborhoods in Chengdu, China, along with a travel behaviour survey of households conducted in 2016, were used to generate several measures of land use diversity and accessibility for each neighborhood. We use principle component analysis (PCA) to group these variables into dimensions that could be used to classify the neighborhoods. We then estimate regression models of low-carbon mode choices such as walking, bicycling, and transit to better understand the significance of these built-environment differences at the neighbourhood level. We find that, first, members of households do choose to walk or bike or take transit to work provided there is relatively high population density and sufficient access to public transit and jobs. Second, land-use diversity alone was not found to be significant in affecting LCT mode choice. Third, the proliferation of gated communities was found to reduce overall spatial connectivity within neighborhoods and had a negative effect on choice of LCT.